Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Mutual information of finite random variables

Statement

For finite random variables M,R with joint law p(m,r) and marginals pM,pR, use the entropy definition H(Y) of Conditional entropy of finite memory given side information for Y=M,R,(M,R). Define I(M;R):=∑p(m,r)>0p(m,r)log⁡p(m,r)pM(m)pR(r). Then I(M;R)=H(M)+H(R)−H(M,R)=H(M)−H(M∣R)≥0, with equality exactly when p(m,r)=pM(m)pR(r) for every pair.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: As stated in the item.

[A1]

p(m,r) is a joint probability law on finite sets and pM,pR are its marginal laws.

[F1]

Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities and Finite sums and finite products, by recursion: the joint and marginal probabilities are finite normalized sums, and if p(m,r)>0 then both marginals are positive.

[F2]

Conditional entropy of finite memory given side information: finite Shannon entropies are defined there and satisfy H(M,R)=H(R)+H(M∣R).

Proof

Given: A finite joint law p(m,r) and its two marginals.

1.1F3F4

Define ϕ(t):=t−1−log⁡t for t>0. Its derivative is 1−1/t, nonpositive on (0,1] and nonnegative on [1,∞); the mean-value theorem [F4] gives ϕ(t)≥ϕ(1)=0, with equality only at t=1. Thus −log⁡t≥1−t, strictly unless t=1.

1.2A1F1F2F3algebra

Expanding the finite logarithmic sum gives I(M;R)=H(M)+H(R)−H(M,R); applying [F2] rewrites it as H(M)−H(M∣R).

2.1A1F1step 1.1step 1.2∎

Put q(m,r):=pM(m)pR(r). For p(m,r)>0, q(m,r)>0 by [F1], and step 1.1 with t=q/p gives plog⁡(p/q)≥p−q. Summing over the support of p yields I(M;R)≥1−∑p>0q≥0. Equality forces q=p on the support and no q-mass outside it, hence equality at every pair; conversely independence makes each positive logarithm zero.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources