Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact Schwarzschild horizon data at the zero-rotation KN point

Statement

In the selected smooth ingoing KN model of Regular ingoing KN metric, field and sphere axes, set a=q=0 and let m=M>0. The metric, time orientation field and potential reduce to g=−f(r) dv2+2 dv dr+r2γ,N=∂v−1+f(r)22∂r,Ain=0,f(r)=1−2mr. The hypersurface H={r=2m} is a null Killing horizon for χ=∂v in the exact vocabulary of Causal solutions, Killing horizons, escape and metric extensions. Its generator is future-directed, its signed surface gravity is κH=1/(4m), and its round sections have area 16πm2. The angular-velocity, potential and angular-momentum parameter functions of Smooth null screen and subextremal Kerr–Newman parameter family are respectively ΩKN=0, ΦKN=0, and j=0 at this parameter point.

This is an exact geometric special case of the selected metric, not a uniqueness or formation theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth ingoing KN metric data and time orientation field of Regular ingoing KN metric, field and sphere axes, the mathematical parameter point m=M>0, a=q=0, and the local horizon vocabulary.

[F1]

Regular ingoing KN metric, field and sphere axes: for real M,a,q on Rv×(0,∞)r×S2, the product metric is smooth, the potential is Ain=−qrΣ−1(dv−aβ), and the time orientation is N=∂v−1+f022∂r, where Σ=r2+a2Z2 and f0=1−(2Mr−q2)/Σ.

[F2]

Causal solutions, Killing horizons, escape and metric extensions: a smooth embedded hypersurface is null when its induced metric is degenerate; a Killing horizon has a nonempty dense nonzero-generator part on which its Killing field is null, tangent and normal; signed surface gravity is fixed by the ambient-covector identity d(g(χ,χ))=−2κHχ♭.

[F3]

Killing fields of a Lorentzian metric: a smooth vector field is Killing exactly when Lχg=0.

[F4]

Smooth null screen and subextremal Kerr–Newman parameter family: at a=q=0, r+=m+m2=2m, D=4m2, A=4πD, j=ma, κKN=(r+−m)/D, ΩKN=a/D, and ΦKN=qr+/D.

[F5]

Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers: for r>0, (r−1)′=−r−2.

[A1]

m>0 and a=q=0. The parameters are real mathematical values; no physical units are assigned by this lemma.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3A1algebra

Substituting M=m, a=q=0 into [F1] gives Σ=r2, f0=f=1−2m/r, the displayed ingoing metric and N=∂v−1+f22∂r; the potential vanishes. The inverse of the (v,r) metric block (−f110) is (011f), so g−1(dr,dr)=f. At rH=2m>0, f(rH)=0 and χ♭=g(∂v,⋅)=−f dv+dr=dr, with dr(χ)=0. Thus H={r=2m} is a null hypersurface and χ is tangent, null and normal there. Since every coefficient is independent of v, Lχg=0, so [F3] makes χ Killing; χ never vanishes, so the nonzero-generator part is all of H. Finally g(χ,N)=dr(N)=−1/2<0 on H, so its generator is future-directed. This verifies the exact horizon conditions in [F2].

2.1F2F4F5step 1.1algebra∎

The Killing norm is g(χ,χ)=−f, so d(g(χ,χ))=−f′(rH)dr. From f(r)=1−2m/r and [F5], f′(r)=2m/r2, so at rH=2m this is −12mdr. Comparing with [F2] and χ♭=dr gives −2κHdr=−12mdr, hence κH=1/(4m). A section at fixed v and r=2m has induced metric (2m)2γ. In spherical coordinates γ=dθ2+sin⁡2θ dψ2, so its area is (2m)2∫02π∫0πsin⁡θ dθ dψ=16πm2. Substitution in [F4] gives the same area and surface-gravity functions and gives j=ΩKN=ΦKN=0.

Remarks

The generic selected-model supplier KN Killing generators, surface gravity, area and potential is stated only for a2+q2>0. This lemma supplies its missing zero-rotation, zero-charge parameter point directly from the smooth ingoing metric data; it does not extend any field-equation or global-horizon conclusion.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources