How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The boundary subobject factors through the cycle subobject
Statement
Let be a chain complex in an abelian category. For every , the boundary inclusion factors uniquely through the cycle inclusion .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A chain complex and an integer .
In a chain complex, (Chain complex in an abelian category).
A kernel is characterized by and universal factorization among arrows annihilated by (Kernels and cokernels in a category with zero morphisms as equalizers and coequalizers).
Every morphism admits an epic-monic factorization; in particular factors as with epic and monic (Every morphism factors as an epimorphism followed by a monomorphism, uniquely up to unique isomorphism).
Proof
By [L3], write with monic and epic. Then by [L1], so epicity of gives .
Since , the kernel property in [L2] gives a unique morphism with , where is the cycle inclusion. That is exactly the required factorization.