Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The derived couple maps are well defined

Statement

The three maps i′,j′,k′ of the derived-couple construction exist in every abelian category and are independent of all local preimages and cycle representatives. Their degrees are (1,−1), (−r,r) and (−1,0), respectively. No choice of global sections is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Derived exact couple gives the image and homology quotient objects and the proposed formulas.

[F2]

Exact couple gives ker⁡j=im⁡i, ker⁡k=im⁡j, ker⁡i=im⁡k and the consecutive zero composites.

[F3]

Spectral sequence subquotient and local lifting calculus permits epic local lifting, descent of subobject membership and unique quotient maps.

Proof

Given: A page-r exact couple. All expressions below are at a fixed homogeneous component with the typed shifts in [F1]; local lifts mean epic pullbacks as in [F3].

1.1F1F3

If a is locally ix, then ia=i(ix) lies in im⁡i. Descent of this membership shows that i restricted to D′⊆D factors through the target D′. Its factorization is unique because that inclusion is monic. This defines i′ without any preimage choice.

1.2F1F2F3

The composite j:D→E lands in ker⁡d since dj=jkj=0. Follow it by ker⁡d→E′. This map kills ker⁡i: an arrow into ker⁡i=im⁡k locally has form kz, and its image is [jkz]=[dz]=0. Hence it descends through D/ker⁡i≅im⁡i to j′, uniquely. Explicitly, if ix=iy locally, then x−y=kz after a further epic pullback, so [jx]−[jy]=[dz]=0. Thus its formula is independent of the preimage.

1.3F1F2F3

On ker⁡d, the map k lands in ker⁡j=im⁡i, because jke=de=0. Changing a cycle representative by a boundary dz changes its image by kdz=kjkz=0. Thus this restricted map kills the boundary image and descends uniquely to k′:E′→D′. Equality after the epic cycle quotient also proves independence for arbitrary maps into E′, not just element representatives.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

For i′ the degree remains (1,−1). To compute j′ on Dp,q′, its local i-preimage is at Dp−1,q+1 and j sends it to Ep−r,q+r, giving degree (−r,r). The cycle restriction and quotient for k′ preserve the original degree (−1,0). The constructions above still apply when any image or homology object is zero, and for r=1 give deg⁡j′=(−1,1). Every lift was a finite local epic pullback used to prove a canonical factorization; no global representative selection or AC was used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources