Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The total differential squares to zero

Statement

For the direct-sum totalisation of an anticommuting homological double complex, dn−1dn=0 for every integer n.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Direct sum total complex of a double complex defines dn by its composites with the diagonal coproduct injections.

[F2]

Homological double complex gives h2=0, v2=0 and the indexed anticommuting-square identity.

[F3]

Products and coproducts as limits and colimits of discrete diagrams, including their existence-and-uniqueness equations gives uniqueness of an arrow out of a coproduct from its composites with all injections.

Proof

Given: Such a double complex C and its existing diagonal coproducts Tn, with injections ιp,qn and differentials dn.

1.1F1algebra

Fix n and p+q=n. Substitute the defining formula for d twice and distribute composition over addition. This gives dn−1dnιp,qn=ιp−2,qn−2hp−1,qhp,q+ιp−1,q−1n−2(vp−1,qhp,q+hp,q−1vp,q)+ιp,q−2n−2vp,q−1vp,q. Each term is an arrow from Cp,q to Tn−2.

2.1F2step 1.1

The first and last composites vanish by the two square-zero axioms; the middle parenthesis vanishes by anticommutation. Therefore dn−1dnιp,qn=0 for every p+q=n, including when any of the source or target components is zero.

3.1F3step 2.1∎

The zero arrow Tn→Tn−2 has these same composites with every injection. Coproduct uniqueness therefore gives dn−1dn=0. Since n was arbitrary, all chain identities hold. The argument also covers an all-zero or a single-supported diagonal and uses no exactness of infinite coproducts or representative selections.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources