Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Metric Variation of a Differential Form Kinetic Term

Statement

Let U⊆Rn be an open oriented coordinate domain. For s in an open interval about 0, let g(s) be a jointly smooth family of smooth nondegenerate metrics on U of the same signature as g(0)=g, equal to g outside one fixed compact set. Put qMN:=∂sg(s)MN∣s=0. Let F be a fixed smooth covariant p-form and let A be a smooth scalar independent of s. Define ∣F∣g2=FM1…MpFM1…Mp/p! and ⟨iMF,iNF⟩g=FMA2…ApFNA2…Ap/(p−1)! for p≥1. The pointwise derivative at s=0 is

δ(∣det⁡g∣ A∣F∣g2)=∣det⁡g∣ A(⟨iMF,iNF⟩g−12gMN∣F∣g2)qMN.

For p=0, the first term in parentheses is defined as zero and the same formula holds.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The metric, fixed covariant form F, metric-independent scalar A, and symmetric inverse-metric variation q in the Statement.

[F1]

The derivative of the determinant along an invertible C¹ matrix curve: (det⁡A)′=det⁡A  tr⁡(A−1A′): δ∣det⁡g∣=−12∣det⁡g∣gMNqMN for qMN=δgMN.

[F2]

A smooth differential k-form and The contraction of a mixed tensor: components of a p-form are alternating covariant arrays; raising its indices uses one inverse metric in each covariant slot.

Proof

1.1F2givenalgebra

For p≥1, write ∣F∣2=(1/p!)FM1…MpFN1…NpgM1N1⋯gMpNp. Differentiating the product of inverse metrics produces p terms. Relabel the dummy indices in each term; antisymmetry of both copies of F makes all p terms equal, so δ∣F∣2=FMA2…ApFNA2…ApqMN/(p−1)!=⟨iMF,iNF⟩qMN. When p=0, F is a scalar and its norm has no metric dependence, giving zero.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The scalar A and covariant components of F are fixed, so the product rule and [F1] give δ(∣g∣A∣F∣2)=∣g∣A[δ∣F∣2−12gMN∣F∣2qMN]. Substituting step 1.1 yields the asserted expression, including the p=0 case.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources