How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Metric Variation of a Differential Form Kinetic Term
Statement
Let be an open oriented coordinate domain. For in an open interval about , let be a jointly smooth family of smooth nondegenerate metrics on of the same signature as , equal to outside one fixed compact set. Put . Let be a fixed smooth covariant -form and let be a smooth scalar independent of . Define and for . The pointwise derivative at is
For , the first term in parentheses is defined as zero and the same formula holds.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The metric, fixed covariant form , metric-independent scalar , and symmetric inverse-metric variation in the Statement.
A smooth differential -form and The contraction of a mixed tensor: components of a -form are alternating covariant arrays; raising its indices uses one inverse metric in each covariant slot.
Proof
For , write . Differentiating the product of inverse metrics produces terms. Relabel the dummy indices in each term; antisymmetry of both copies of makes all terms equal, so . When , is a scalar and its norm has no metric dependence, giving zero.
The scalar and covariant components of are fixed, so the product rule and [F1] give . Substituting step 1.1 yields the asserted expression, including the case.