How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vanishing sets of finite products
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, and let with . Then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , ideals , and an integer .
is the set of prime ideals containing (The prime spectrum and vanishing sets).
A prime ideal contains a factor whenever it contains a product (Prime ideals and maximal ideals in a commutative ring).
Proof
If for some , then . Every element of lies in , so , and therefore . This proves .
Conversely, let and suppose that no is contained in . For each , choose . Then , so repeated use of [L2] forces some , a contradiction. Hence for some , and .
The two inclusions prove .