Alphabeta Math
Open problemQuestion: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated‡ sources checked 2026-11-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Special-Lagrangian fibration and corrected dual for the quintic

Open problem

Fix a one-parameter MUM degeneration f:X→Δ whose general fibre Xt is a smooth quintic threefold, together with specified Ricci-flat Kähler metrics normalized by ∫Xtωt3/3!=1. Construct, for sufficiently small t≠0, a smooth SYZ fibration on a specified open subset Xt∘⊆Xt, with special-Lagrangian T3 fibres over the complement of an explicitly controlled discriminant. Here the discriminant is to be a specified closed, locally finite codimension-at-least-two subset of the three-dimensional base with its integral-affine monodromy data; the fibration must be a proper submersion over its complement.

Then form the dual local-system tori Hom⁡(H1(Lb;Z),U(1)), specify a completed coefficient ring, wall functions, scattering diagram and theta-function or equivalent correction rule, and prove that the corrected dual compactifies to a complex family isomorphic to the specified mirror quintic family under a stated parameter map. The family, open subset, discriminant, metric normalization, coefficient completion, correction series, and mirror parameter map must all be fixed; no global fibration or correction is implicit in this formulation.

Status

Reviewed as of 2026-11-04. The sources reviewed here do not establish this full target. This is a literature-scope assessment, not a proof that no result exists; the exact target remains the specified metric special-Lagrangian fibration together with the corrected complex-family reconstruction.

The literature contains relevant results at distinct scopes:

  • The local Calabi theorem and Ricci-flat corollary supply individual metric existence under their stated compact-Kähler hypotheses. This open problem still takes the normalized metric family as specified data; individual metric existence does not supply the controlled degeneration, special-Lagrangian fibration or corrected mirror reconstruction requested here.
  • Yang Li, Theorem 1.1 (arXiv:1912.02360v1), constructs special-Lagrangian torus fibrations on generic regions in the Fermat hypersurface family near the large-complex-structure limit, along a subsequence, with the volume fraction of those regions tending to one. For dimension three this includes a Fermat quintic family. It does not give the specified global complement/discriminant compactification or corrected mirror-family isomorphism.
  • Wei-Dong Ruan, Theorem 6.2 (arXiv:math/9909126v2), constructs corresponding Lagrangian torus fibrations for generic quintics near the large-complex limit and mirror quintics near the large-radius limit, with naturally dual regular fibres under the stated symplectic-topological setup. The paper explicitly distinguishes these Lagrangian fibrations from the then-expected special-Lagrangian fibrations (Introduction, pp. 3–5); its theorem therefore does not supply the metric special-Lagrangian family or the correction and compactification data fixed above.
  • Yang Li, Theorems 1.4 and 1.8 (arXiv:2605.00516v1), proves a metric-SYZ result for polarized maximal degenerations under the weak comparison property and a valuatively independent basis hypothesis. The reported conclusion gives special-Lagrangian torus fibrations on open subsets of measure at least 1−δ for every δ>0, for sufficiently small parameter. Blum–Liu Theorem 1.1 (arXiv:2604.27890v1) supplies valuatively independent bases for every positive tensor power over a DVR essentially of finite type over a characteristic-zero field, and for sufficiently divisible positive tensor powers over k⟦t⟧, under its stated projective log-canonical Calabi–Yau and ample-line-bundle hypotheses. Applying this chain to a particular quintic requires checking those exact hypotheses; it is not a proof here.
  • Yamamoto Theorem 1.1 (Selecta Math. 32 (2026), arXiv:2404.04972) gives non-Archimedean affinoid torus fibrations outside a codimension-two discriminant for the stated Batyrev–Borisov toric degenerations. That is not a metric special-Lagrangian fibration or a corrected complex mirror reconstruction.
  • Gross–Wilson gives K3 and Borcea–Voisin cases at its exact lattice and possibly degenerate-metric scope, not a quintic reconstruction.

Thus the reviewed sources establish partial metric-SYZ results, symplectic-topological Lagrangian duality, and non-Archimedean torus fibrations, each under its own hypotheses. None of the exact statements above supplies all requested metric, discriminant, coefficient-completion, correction, and mirror-isomorphism data simultaneously. That scope comparison is an inference from the cited theorem statements, not a new theorem.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources