How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Adopted compact-boson flat-gauging and rational self-duality model
Restricted source-described noncompact SymTFT and two-step flat-gauging model for the idealized compact-boson CFT at dimensionless radius R>0, with a separately selected rational finite-wall normalization. No empirical assertion, rigorous continuum functional measure, or irrational absolute fusion normalization is supplied.
Postulate
Fix the idealized compact-boson full-local-CFT package at dimensionless radius , with local Ginsparg radius and genuine primary labels , . Adopt the source's noncompact SymTFT and two-step flat-gauging construction as restricted physical model data. First gauge with flat connections, producing the noncompact intermediate scalar theory. Then gauge the period- subgroup of its momentum-shift symmetry. This supplies a topological radius-changing interface . Compose it with the selected invertible radius-duality interface to form .
Adopt the source-reported charge-label action, up to a nonzero overall normalization, A non-genuine endpoint belongs to an endpoint sector of the interface data and is not a genuine bulk local-field label. This assumption supplies the construction and its label action; it does not supply a continuum functional-measure foundation or an absolute normalization at irrational .
For reduced rational , with positive coprime integers , adopt the source's anomaly-free finite subgroup gauging and select an invertible self-duality interface . Under this identification, the specified gauging symmetry lines become the lines acting by Use the untwisted endpoint-framed finite gauging wall with the finite-groupoid-cardinality convention: hold both endpoint trivializations fixed, weight a framed flat-bundle sector by , and include no extra division by at the endpoints. Define the rationally normalized defect to be exactly , with no additional scalar.
The two-step construction and the finite rational construction are identified here only in their source-reported charge-label action up to normalization. The exact finite-wall normalization is a selected rational model input. It is not a claim that the source proves an exact scalar match between these constructions. No continuous-gauging normalization is inferred.
Postulate references
Scope and non-derivation
This is an explicitly adopted source-described model construction, rather than a proof that every compact-boson algebra has the required continuum gauging realization. It records no empirical measurements or tests. The source obtains the construction using functional gauge-field integrals; this item does not provide a rigorously constructed continuum measure. Its irrational absolute normalization and twisted-Hilbert-space interpretation are not asserted.
Finite semisimplicity of the rational group-line sector and pairwise non-isomorphic simplicity of its lines remain separate hypotheses of the consuming fusion theorem and example. Neither their fusion direct sum nor noninvertibility is postulated here: those are deductions requiring the finite-wall counting result, the declared line-sector hypotheses, and the genuine-field argument. No finite fusion-category structure is assumed for an irrational-radius continuous construction.