Alphabeta Math
PostulateStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Interior stationary Einstein–Maxwell–matter action

Physical scope

A separately adopted interior variational formulation for smooth fields in a fixed principal U(1)-bundle sector with the stated connection normalization and one selected matter action. Only compactly supported variations, or variations vanishing near a physical boundary, are used. Boundary variational principles, singular self-fields, existence or uniqueness of coupled solutions, and empirical validity are not asserted.

Postulate

Use the smooth oriented, time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold, curvature convention and SI constants of Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions and Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions. Choose the actual matter functional Sm[g,ω,Ψ] and its fixed smooth right principal U(1) bundle π:P→M from Selected invariant matter-action contract. In its fixed normalized connection sector, the local representatives are ai, the physical local potentials are Ai=κ0ai, and their globally defined physical curvature satisfies F∣Ui=dAi=κ0dai and dF=0. A global real potential is not required. Write R:=gabRic⁡ab for the scalar curvature of the metric-selected connection, with the curvature convention of Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions. For configurations where the action is finite, or for compactly supported action differences on a noncompact manifold, adopt

Stot[g,ω,Ψ]=c316πGN∫M(R−2Λ) volg−14μ0c∫MFabFab volg+Sm[g,ω,Ψ].

Adopt that a configuration is dynamically admissible in this branch exactly when the first variation of this total action vanishes independently for every smooth compactly supported symmetric inverse-metric variation, every smooth compactly supported fixed-sector physical connection variation α∈Ω1(M), and every admissible compactly supported matter-field variation. The connection variation changes Ai by α∣Ui, equivalently changes ai by κ0−1α∣Ui, while leaving the bundle and transition data fixed; thus δF=dα. If M has a physical boundary, only variations vanishing on a neighbourhood of that boundary are included. This makes no claim about a Gibbons–Hawking–York or other boundary action.

The earlier postulate Adopt stationary Maxwell action as alternative physical formulation concerns its stated flat electromagnetic and prescribed-potential particle sectors. It supplies no unified matter–gravity action or coupled-solution theorem; the functional above is an additional, explicitly adopted model. An equation-based Einstein–Maxwell formulation is a separate alternative, not a premise of this action branch.

All displayed coefficients are model parameters with the units and interpretations in Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions. Compact support is essential: the Einstein–Hilbert and Maxwell integrations by parts have boundary terms in general. The postulate asserts neither that its stationary configurations exist nor that the action describes nature.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources