How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-modal fluid observation and noise model
Adopted discrete-time model for specified ideal weighted spatial velocity sensors applied to a finite-dimensional modal representation of a three-dimensional fluid velocity field in a fixed nonrelativistic Cartesian inertial chart. Gaussian initial-state, process-noise, and observation-noise assumptions are part of this selected model regime; no actual sensor calibration, universal fluid law, nonlinear or untruncated flow model, or empirical validity is asserted.
Postulate
Let be a nonempty open interval and let be a three-dimensional oriented Euclidean affine space. Fix an orientation-preserving affine isometry as the Cartesian inertial chart on Newtonian spacetime , with absolute time in seconds and spatial position in metres. Let be a bounded Lebesgue-measurable observation region with volume , and let be the space of almost-everywhere equivalence classes of square-integrable vector fields, with norm . Write for the sigma-algebra generated by the norm-open sets. A velocity field has units m s.
Choose an integer observation horizon and times in , where observations are taken at . For each , let and choose dimensionless modal fields . Define the modal map by . The coefficient vector has units m s, with initial mean in m s, and its represented velocity field is . This finite-dimensional representation is an adopted approximation for the selected observation times; it does not assert that an untruncated fluid field lies in one of these finite-dimensional spaces.
For each , choose sensor weights , with units m. The ideal sensor on a field is the weighted spatial average ; it is not a point evaluation. Define by and define the dimensionless observation matrix by . Thus , and each datum and observation-noise component has units m s.
On a common probability space , adopt the finite linear-Gaussian coefficient model where , , , and ; is dimensionless, has coefficient units m s, and has observation units m s. The vectors are mutually independent. Here denotes the -dimensional Gaussian law with mean and covariance , including singular covariance. A symmetric matrix is positive semidefinite, written , if for every vector of the matching dimension. The covariance matrices have this property, with entries carrying the corresponding squared units. Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC), meaning every family of nonempty sets has a choice function, for the Gaussian-law construction. The finite-dimensional Gaussian laws and their common probability-space realization use this assumption. For each , define the field law by for ; finite modal fields with finite-second-moment coefficients have finite-second-moment laws.
These linearity, Gaussianity, independence, covariance, finite-mode, and ideal-sensor conditions are adopted physical-model assumptions for this selected regime. The sensor weights and covariance matrices are model inputs; no calibration procedure is asserted. These conditions report no measurements and do not assert that an actual flow, observation system, or noise source satisfies them. Biased or temporally correlated errors, nonlinear observation maps, and untruncated fluid dynamics require separately stated models.
Postulate references
Classical frames, primitive quantities and SI units
Finite-second-moment random velocity sensor law
The L2 velocity sensor is well-defined
Finite modal velocity fields inherit finite second moments
Finite coefficient observation and innovation interface
Särkkä, Bayesian Filtering and Smoothing, Chapter 4 §§4.1–4.3
Facts & Assumptions
Assume the Axiom of Choice for the Gaussian-law construction of the finite linear-Gaussian model. The Axiom of Choice
The classical frame is an adapted Cartesian inertial chart on Newtonian spacetime with absolute time; the fluid velocity is an Eulerian vector field with SI units m s. Classical frames, primitive quantities and SI units
is a space of almost-everywhere field classes with its norm topology, and is a weighted spatial sensor, not a point evaluation. Finite-second-moment random velocity sensor law
For every , the sensor integral is finite, representative-independent, linear, and bounded by . The L2 velocity sensor is well-defined
A finite linear modal map sends a measurable finite-second-moment coefficient vector to a strongly measurable field with a finite-second-moment pushforward law. Finite modal velocity fields inherit finite second moments
The finite coefficient model uses affine state and observation equations with mutually independent Gaussian vectors and positive-semidefinite covariances; its finite observation matrix is defined from the chosen linear observation map. Finite coefficient observation and innovation interface
is a -dimensional Gaussian law with mean and positive-semidefinite covariance , including when is singular; the independent-noise realization assumes AC. Finite coefficient observation and innovation interface The Axiom of Choice