Alphabeta Math
PostulateStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck pass‡ sources checked 2026-11-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Silverstein Westphal Nil Background Data For Wrapped D4 Reduction

Physical scope

The local Nil metric and lattice on two isomorphic compact three-manifolds, constant-dilaton, and vanishing worldvolume NS/Abelian-flux data used for the geometric DBI contribution in Silverstein–Westphal §§2.2–2.3; not a complete stabilized ten-dimensional solution.

Postulate

Take dimensionless coordinates (u1,u2,x′)∈R3, integer M≥1, and quotient by the lattice transformations τ1(u1,u2,x′)=(u1+1,u2,x′−Mu2),τ2(u1,u2,x′)=(u1,u2+1,x′),τx(u1,u2,x′)=(u1,u2,x′+1). The adopted Nil metric block is dsN32=α′ ⁣(Lu12du12+Lu22du22+Lx2(dx′+Mu1du2)2), with Lu1,Lu2,Lx>0 dimensionless and [α′]=length2. Define Lu2=Lu1Lu2, β=Lu2/Lu1>0, so Lu1=Lu/β, Lu2=Luβ, and L3=Lu2Lx. Define the second factor N~3 as an isomorphic copy of N3 with dimensionless coordinates (u~1,u~2,x~′)∈R3, quotient transformations τ~1(u~1,u~2,x~′)=(u~1+1,u~2,x~′−Mu~2), τ~2(u~1,u~2,x~′)=(u~1,u~2+1,x~′), and τ~x(u~1,u~2,x~′)=(u~1,u~2,x~′+1), and metric dsN~32=α′ ⁣(Lu12du~12+Lu22du~22+Lx2(dx~′+Mu~1du~2)2). Let X4 be a smooth oriented boundaryless four-manifold with a smooth Lorentzian string-frame metric g4,s∈Γ(Sym⁡2T∗X4) of signature (−,+,+,+); write ds4,s2 for its local line element, with units of length squared. On X10:=X4×N3×N~3, take the smooth product metric G(s):=π4∗g4,s+πN∗gN+πN~∗gN~ of signature (−,+,…,+), where the π are the three projections and gN,gN~ are the metric tensors just specified. Thus ds10,s2=ds4,s2+dsN32+dsN~32. The dilaton is the constant field Φ=Φ∞, and the dimensionless string coupling is gstr:=eΦ∞>0. For the DBI contribution isolated in the cited calculation, set the pulled-back B2 and FA to zero and keep Chern–Simons, stabilization, loop, and higher-α′ contributions separate. These are adopted background data for a probe calculation, not proof that the compactification equations have a global solution.

Remarks

Silverstein–Westphal §2.3, equation (2.6), describes the second Nil factor as isometric to the first; the tilded metric and quotient above make that adopted copy explicit. The lattice preserves dx′+Mu1du2: under τ1, dx′↦dx′−Mdu2 and u1↦u1+1, so the added terms cancel. The same calculation holds in the tilded copy. This local metric postulate does not specify the global orientifold image or the net D4 charge.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources