How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
; and ; if and only if ; ; ; and while only holds
Statement
For all sets and :
- (i) ;
- (ii) and ;
- (iii) if and only if ;
- (iv) ;
- (v) ;
- (vi) ;
- (vii) ;
- (viii) the inclusion in (vii) is an equality if and only if or .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: sets and .
holds if and only if (The power set ).
means that every element of is an element of (Subset , proper subset , and the separation notation ).
If and then (, , inclusion is transitive, and if and only if and ).
is the set whose elements are exactly the elements of the elements of (The union of a set, and the binary union ).
For , is the set whose elements are exactly the sets belonging to every element of (The intersection of a nonempty set, the binary intersection , and disjointness).
holds if and only if or (, , , , and ).
holds if and only if and (, , , , and ).
There is exactly one set with no elements, written (There is exactly one set with no elements, written ).
, the singleton of , is the set whose only element is (The unordered pair and the singleton ).
If every satisfies if and only if , then (The Axiom of Extensionality: ).
Proof
Claim (i): holds exactly when , that is, when every element of lies in ; since has no elements this says has no elements, hence . So the elements of are exactly , and .
Claim (ii): and , so both and are elements of .
Claim (iii): if and , then and give , so ; conversely if then , since , so , which says .
Claim (iv): holds exactly when belongs to some element of , that is, to some with , and any such lies in ; conversely if then lies in the element of . So the two sets have the same elements.
Claim (v): , so and is defined; an element of it would have to belong to every element of , in particular to , which has no elements. So has no elements and equals .
Claim (vi): holds exactly when every element of lies in , that is, lies in and in ; this is exactly together with , that is, and , which is .
Claim (vii): if then or ; in either case every element of lies in or in , hence in , so .
Claim (viii): if then the elements of are exactly those of , so is equivalent to and , which with the reverse inclusion gives equality; the case is symmetric. Conversely, if equality holds then puts in , so or , and since and these give and respectively.
Claims (i) to (viii) are established, which is the statement.
Depends on
The power set
Subset , proper subset , and the separation notation
, , inclusion is transitive, and if and only if and
The union of a set, and the binary union
The intersection of a nonempty set, the binary intersection , and disjointness
, , , , and
There is exactly one set with no elements, written
The unordered pair and the singleton
The Axiom of Extensionality: