Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

RN roots, Killing horizons and surface gravity

Statement

Let M>0, Q2=qe2+qm2>0, and use f(r)=1−2M/r+Q2/r2 on the selected ingoing RN model. If M2≥Q2, the positive roots r±=M±M2−Q2 are null constant-r hypersurfaces. For the Killing field ξ=∂v normalized by the displayed coordinate for which g(ξ,ξ)→−1 as r→∞, each is a Killing horizon in the local sense of Causal solutions, Killing horizons, escape and metric extensions, with signed surface gravity κ±=f′(r±)2=r±−r∓2r±2. At extremality M2=Q2, the coincident root is rH=M and κH=0. If M2<Q2, f has no positive root and no constant-r null hypersurface of this form. These are local properties of the selected metric; they do not classify event horizons in a maximal spacetime.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M>0, Q2>0, the selected ingoing RN metric, and the exact current meanings of null hypersurface, Killing horizon and surface gravity.

[F1]

Selected ingoing RN extension and time orientation: g=−f dv2+2 dv dr+r2γ, g−1(dr,dr)=grr=f, and ξ=∂v is a global product field.

[F2]

Explicit rational and real power regimes: the square root of a nonnegative real is its unique nonnegative real root, with 0=0. This current batch-2 definition is used only for the exact root convention.

[F3]

Killing fields of a Lorentzian metric: a smooth vector field ξ is Killing when Lξg=0.

[L1]

Causal solutions, Killing horizons, escape and metric extensions, Definition (b): a level with nonzero conormal is null exactly when that conormal has zero metric square. A Killing horizon has a nonempty dense nonzero-generator portion with tangent null normal Killing field, and its signed surface gravity is fixed by the ambient covector equation d(g(ξ,ξ))=−2κHξ♭.

[A1]

All parameters are real and square roots are nonnegative. The parameter and radius units are metres; κ has units of inverse length.

Proof

1.1givenF2A1algebra

Multiplying f by r2 gives r2f=r2−2Mr+Q2. If M2≥Q2, the quadratic formula gives the stated roots. Because 0<Q2≤M2 and M>0, the nonnegative root s=M2−Q2 satisfies s<M: otherwise s2≥M2, contradicting s2=M2−Q2<M2. Thus both M+s and M−s are positive. If M2<Q2, then r2f=(r−M)2+(Q2−M2)>0 for every r>0, so there is no positive root.

2.1F1F3L1step 1.1algebra

The inverse v,r block in [F1] gives g−1(dr,dr)=grr=f. Thus a positive root gives a null level hypersurface. The metric coefficients are independent of v, hence Lξg=0 and ξ is Killing by [F3]. At a root, ξ♭=−f dv+dr=dr and dr(ξ)=0, so ξ is null, tangent and normal to that level. The product field ∂v is nonzero everywhere on the level, so its nonzero-generator part is the whole level, nonempty and dense. This verifies the Killing-horizon conditions in [L1].

3.1L1step 2.1algebra

On the root set, ξ♭=dr and d(g(ξ,ξ))=d(−f)=−f′(rH)dr. Comparing with the normalization in [L1] gives κH=f′(rH)/2. Factoring f=(r−r+)(r−r−)/r2 and differentiating at either root gives f′(r±)=r±−r∓r±2, which proves the stated formula, including its negative sign at the inner simple root. If M2=Q2, then r+=r−=M and the formula gives zero.

4.1F1L1step 1.1algebra∎

If M2<Q2, step 1.1 gives f>0 for every r>0. Therefore g−1(dr,dr)>0 and no positive constant-r level is null. This rules out only the radial-root horizons under discussion, not other global horizon notions.

Remarks

The horizon and signed surface-gravity terms use the current exact vocabulary Definition. The proof establishes their conditions for this selected model, without an event-horizon identification or an independent acceptance claim.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources