Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The exponential map scales geodesic time

Statement

Assume ACω. For v∈TpM and t∈R, t∈Ip,v⟺tv∈Ep, and whenever these equivalent conditions hold, exp⁡p(tv)=γp,v(t). In particular, if v∈Ep, then sv∈Ep for every s∈[0,1].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A boundaryless smooth manifold with an affine connection, v∈TpM, and t∈R.

[F1]

Under The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), Geodesic scaling identity gives γp,av(u)=γp,v(au) and, for a≠0, Ip,av=a−1Ip,v; for a=0 the scaled geodesic is constant on R.

[F2]

Domain and exponential map of a connection says w∈Ep exactly when 1∈Ip,w and then exp⁡p(w)=γp,w(1).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

Suppose first that t≠0. By [F1], 1∈Ip,tv iff t∈Ip,v, and on that domain γp,tv(1)=γp,v(t). Applying [F2] proves both the domain equivalence and the exponential identity.

1.2F1F2

If t=0, then 0∈Ip,v, while [F1] makes γp,0 the constant curve on R; hence 0v∈Ep and exp⁡p(0)=p=γp,v(0). Thus the equivalence and identity also hold at zero.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2

Let v∈Ep and s∈[0,1]. Then 1∈Ip,v by [F2]. Since Ip,v is an interval containing 0, it contains s, so step 1.1 or 1.2 gives sv∈Ep. Thus every fibre domain is star-shaped about zero. Negative parameters are covered by step 1.1 whenever the corresponding geodesic time lies in the maximal interval.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

On an empty manifold there are no initial vectors. In dimension zero only step 1.2 occurs, and in dimension one the proof is unchanged. Zero velocity and zero scale were handled explicitly; membership is always at the interior time 1 of an open maximal interval, including when the original time is a finite endpoint candidate. The stated ACω is inherited through [F1]--[F2], and no additional selection is made.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources