How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quartic graph superficial degree from exact counting
Statement
Let and let be a finite quartic graph in the sense of Finite quartic graph and superficial scaling conventions. With vertices, internal edges, external half-edges, and loop count , the incidence and loop-count identities are and . Its superficial degree under the stated Euclidean scalar power-counting convention is . In this reduces to . A zero value is a logarithmic superficial degree by the convention in the definition; these identities do not assert convergence or divergence of an actual graph integral.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and a finite connected multigraph with four-slot vertices, internal edges, and external half-edges, using degree per loop integration and degree per internal scalar propagator.
Finite quartic graph and superficial scaling conventions: the internal-edge ends and the attached external half-edges are in bijection with the four incidence slots at each vertex; is the cycle rank; one formal loop integration contributes degree , each internal scalar propagator contributes degree , and . The value is called logarithmic superficial degree and is only formal graph bookkeeping.
Proof
Given: The graph and power-counting data in [F1].
Counting the four slots at every vertex gives slots. Each of the internal edges occupies two slots, including a self-loop, and each of the external half-edges occupies one. Hence .
Start with one vertex and repeatedly add an internal edge from the reached vertices to a vertex not yet reached. Connectedness provides such an edge until all vertices are reached. Each added edge introduces one new vertex, so the selected edges form a spanning tree with edges; for it is empty. Exactly internal edges lie outside this tree, including any unselected loops or parallel edges, so the cycle rank in [F1] is nonnegative and counts the non-tree internal edges.
By [F1], . Substitute from step 1.2 to obtain . From step 1.1, , so .
Setting in step 2.1 gives . The defining convention in [F1] calls its zero value logarithmic superficial degree; it makes no claim about an actual integral's convergence or divergence.