Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quartic graph superficial degree from exact counting

Statement

Let D∈Z≥1 and let Γ be a finite quartic graph in the sense of Finite quartic graph and superficial scaling conventions. With V vertices, I internal edges, E external half-edges, and loop count L, the incidence and loop-count identities are 4V=2I+E and L=I−V+1. Its superficial degree under the stated Euclidean scalar power-counting convention is ωD(Γ)=DL−2I=D+(D−4)V−D−22E. In D=4 this reduces to ω4(Γ)=4−E. A zero value is a logarithmic superficial degree by the convention in the definition; these identities do not assert convergence or divergence of an actual graph integral.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: D∈Z≥1 and a finite connected multigraph Γ with V≥1 four-slot vertices, I internal edges, and E external half-edges, using degree D per loop integration and degree −2 per internal scalar propagator.

[F1]

Finite quartic graph and superficial scaling conventions: the internal-edge ends and the attached external half-edges are in bijection with the four incidence slots at each vertex; L:=I−V+1 is the cycle rank; one formal loop integration contributes degree D, each internal scalar propagator contributes degree −2, and ωD(Γ):=DL−2I. The value ωD=0 is called logarithmic superficial degree and is only formal graph bookkeeping.

Proof

Given: The graph and power-counting data in [F1].

1.1givenF1algebra

Counting the four slots at every vertex gives 4V slots. Each of the I internal edges occupies two slots, including a self-loop, and each of the E external half-edges occupies one. Hence 4V=2I+E.

1.2givenF1construct

Start with one vertex and repeatedly add an internal edge from the reached vertices to a vertex not yet reached. Connectedness provides such an edge until all V vertices are reached. Each added edge introduces one new vertex, so the selected edges form a spanning tree with V−1 edges; for V=1 it is empty. Exactly I−(V−1)=I−V+1=L internal edges lie outside this tree, including any unselected loops or parallel edges, so the cycle rank in [F1] is nonnegative and counts the non-tree internal edges.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

By [F1], ωD=DL−2I. Substitute L=I−V+1 from step 1.2 to obtain ωD=(D−2)I−DV+D. From step 1.1, I=2V−E/2, so ωD=(D−2)(2V−E/2)−DV+D=D+(D−4)V−D−22E.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

Setting D=4 in step 2.1 gives ω4=4−E. The defining convention in [F1] calls its zero value logarithmic superficial degree; it makes no claim about an actual integral's convergence or divergence.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources