Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scalar engineering dimensions and tree-level dilation

Statement

Let D∈Z≥1, let ϕ∈Cc∞(RD;R) (the smooth real-valued functions with compact support), let r≥3 be an integer, and let gr∈R∖{0}. The Euclidean gradient is ∇Eϕ:=(∂1ϕ,…,∂Dϕ) and its squared norm is ∣∇Eϕ∣2:=∑j=1D(∂jϕ)2. With Lebesgue measure dDx on RD, define the real-valued functionals

Skin(ϕ):=12∫RD∣∇Eϕ(x)∣2 dDx,Sr(ϕ):=gr∫RDϕ(x)r dDx.

They are finite because ϕ and its derivatives have compact support. Use the following formal natural-unit mass-degree convention: set ℏ=c=1, assign degree −1 to each coordinate xμ (1≤μ≤D), degree 1 to each partial derivative, and degree −D to dDx; degrees add under products. Normalize both displayed functionals as dimensionless action terms of degree 0. The symbols [ϕ] and [gr] denote their formal mass degrees in this convention; these are the engineering dimensions. They are [ϕ]=(D−2)/2 and [gr]=D−r(D−2)/2. Under the dilation ϕb(x)=b−(D−2)/2ϕ(x/b) for b>0, Skin(ϕb)=Skin(ϕ) and Sr(ϕb)=bD−r(D−2)/2Sr(ϕ). Call the monomial relevant, marginal, or irrelevant at tree level according as this dilation exponent is positive, zero, or negative. Thus a quartic monomial has exponent 4−D: it is relevant for D<4, marginal by engineering dimension for D=4, and irrelevant for D>4. These labels concern only this classical engineering-dimension convention; no quantum correction, fixed point, or renormalization-group flow is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: D∈Z≥1, b>0, ϕ∈Cc∞(RD;R), integer r≥3, and real scalar gr≠0.

[A1]

The statement's formal natural-unit mass-degree convention assigns [xμ]=−1, [∂μ]=1, [dDx]=−D, and degree 0 to both Skin and Sr; degrees add under products, with ℏ=c=1.

[A2]

The specified functionals are the Lebesgue integrals of the Euclidean-gradient and monomial densities in the statement; compact support makes both integrals finite.

Proof

Given: The dimension convention [A1] and the functionals and domain in [A2].

1.1givenA1A2algebra

Since Skin has degree 0 and dDx has degree −D, its integrand ∣∇Eϕ∣2 has degree D. Each Euclidean partial derivative contributes degree 1, so 2+2[ϕ]=D and [ϕ]=(D−2)/2.

1.2givenA2algebra

By the chain rule, ∂j(ϕb)(x)=b−(D−2)/2−1(∂jϕ)(x/b) for each j=1,…,D. With x=by, Lebesgue measure contributes bD and the two differentiated fields contribute b−(D−2)−2=b−D, so Skin(ϕb)=Skin(ϕ).

2.1givenA1A2step 1.1algebra

By [A1], Sr has degree 0, so its integrand grϕr must have degree D. Therefore [gr]+r[ϕ]=D, and substituting step 1.1 gives [gr]=D−r(D−2)/2.

3.1givenA1A2step 1.1algebra∎

For the monomial, the same Lebesgue change of variables gives Sr(ϕb)=grbDb−r(D−2)/2∫ϕ(y)rdDy=bD−r(D−2)/2Sr(ϕ). At r=4 the exponent is 4−D, whose sign gives the stated relevant, marginal, or irrelevant tree-level label.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources