Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Schwinger term obeys the Lie cocycle condition

Statement

For the finite-dimensional real Lie algebra g, invariant symmetric form κ, smooth loop algebra Lg, and bilinear form ω defined in Loop current Lie algebra and central term, the form ω is alternating and satisfies ω([X,Y],Z)+ω([Y,Z],X)+ω([Z,X],Y)=0(X,Y,Z∈Lg). Consequently the candidate bracket on Lg^ is a Lie bracket and gives a one-dimensional central extension of Lg by R.

Exact sequence diagram

The arrows are the linear inclusion i(a)=(0,a) and projection p(X,a)=X. The proof verifies that these maps are Lie-algebra homomorphisms, that ker⁡p=im⁡i, and that im⁡i is central. The diagram records the resulting exact sequence; the proof does not rely on the diagram.

0RcLgLg0ip

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional real Lie algebra, periodic smooth loops, invariant symmetric form, cocycle formula, and candidate bracket of Loop current Lie algebra and central term.

[F1]

Loop current Lie algebra and central term: Lg=C∞(S1,g) has the pointwise Lie bracket; κ is symmetric and satisfies κ([U,V],W)=κ(U,[V,W]); ω(X,Y)=(2π)−1∫02πκ(X,Y′) dθ; and the candidate bracket on Lg⊕R is [(X,a),(Y,b)]=([X,Y],ω(X,Y)).

Proof

Given: [F1].

1.1givenF1algebra

Bilinearity of κ and differentiation makes ω bilinear. By symmetry and the product rule, ω(X,Y)+ω(Y,X)=12π∫02π(κ(X,Y′)+κ(X′,Y)) dθ=12π[κ(X,Y)]02π=0. The endpoint values agree because X and Y are smooth maps on S1, so ω is skew-symmetric; over R, this implies ω(X,X)=0.

1.2givenF1algebra

Invariance and symmetry give κ([X,Y],Z′)=κ(X,[Y,Z′]),κ([Y,Z],X′)=κ(X′,[Y,Z]),κ([Z,X],Y′)=κ(X,[Y′,Z]). The product rule and [Y,Z]′=[Y′,Z]+[Y,Z′] therefore yield κ([X,Y],Z′)+κ([Y,Z],X′)+κ([Z,X],Y′)=∂θκ(X,[Y,Z]). Integrating over one period makes the right-hand side zero. By the definition of ω, this is the required cyclic cocycle identity.

2.1givenF1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

The displayed operation is bilinear and skew-symmetric by the pointwise Lie bracket and step 1.1. The vector component of its Jacobi sum is the pointwise Jacobi sum in g, hence vanishes at every θ. Its real component is the cyclic sum in step 1.2, hence also vanishes. Thus the operation satisfies Jacobi and is a Lie bracket.

3.1givenF1step 2.1algebra∎

The maps i(a)=(0,a) and p(X,a)=X are Lie-algebra homomorphisms: the bracket of any two elements in im⁡i is zero, and p([(X,a),(Y,b)])=[X,Y]. The projection is surjective because p(X,0)=X, and ker⁡p={(0,a):a∈R}=im⁡i. Moreover [(0,a),(Y,b)]=(0,ω(0,Y))=(0,0) by bilinearity of ω, so the kernel is central. This proves the asserted central extension.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 1 level

Sources