Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tangent space of a free proper quotient

Statement

For a smooth free proper action and x∈M, the quotient differential is surjective and

ker⁡(dqx)=Tx(G⋅x).

Consequently it induces a canonical linear isomorphism

TxM/Tx(G⋅x)→ ≅ T[x](M/G).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth free proper action of G on M, its quotient map q:M→M/G, and x∈M.

[F1]

The quotient map is a smooth surjective submersion. Free proper action quotient manifold.

[F2]

A slice gives product coordinates G×S→G⋅S around x. Local slice for a free proper action.

[F3]

A linear map vanishing on a subspace factors uniquely through the vector space quotient. A module homomorphism vanishing on N factors uniquely through M/N.

Proof

technique · compute in slice-product coordinates
1.1F1F2

Choose the slice S through x from [F2]. Under the diffeomorphism A:G×S→G⋅S, the quotient map is the projection (g,s)↦s, followed by the slice chart S≅q(G⋅S). Its differential at (e,x) is therefore the projection TeG⊕TxS→TxS.

2.1step 1.1F2

The kernel of that projection is TeG⊕0. Its image under dA(e,x) is exactly the tangent space to the orbit map g↦g⋅x, namely Tx(G⋅x). Thus ker⁡(dqx)=Tx(G⋅x), and the same coordinate projection shows that dqx is surjective.

3.1F3step 2.1∎

By step 2.1, dqx vanishes exactly on Tx(G⋅x), so [F3] gives an injective induced linear map from TxM/Tx(G⋅x) to T[x](M/G). It is surjective because dqx is, and hence is an isomorphism. The formula holds also for a zero-dimensional group and uses no choice principle.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources