How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Topological-domain equicontinuity agrees with metric equicontinuity on a metric domain
Statement
Let and be metric spaces, give its metric topology, and let . Then is equicontinuous in the topological-domain sense if and only if it is equicontinuous in the published metric epsilon-delta sense.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Metric spaces and a family .
Topological-domain equicontinuity requires, for each and , one neighbourhood of on which every satisfies (Equicontinuity on a topological domain and pointwise relative compactness).
Metric equicontinuity requires, for each and , one such that implies for all (Equicontinuity at a point, uniform equicontinuity, and pointwise boundedness of a family of maps between metric spaces).
Every metric neighbourhood of contains a positive-radius open ball about (The balls , , form a countable neighbourhood base at , so every metric space is first countable).
Proof
Suppose [L1] holds, and fix and . Choose its common neighbourhood ; by [L3], some ball lies in . The same works for every , so [L2] holds.
Conversely suppose [L2] holds. For fixed and , let be the common radius supplied there. The open neighbourhood then satisfies [L1] for every .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove both directions without changing the order of the family quantifier.