Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Vector-bundle pullback is canonically functorial

Statement

For E→Z and composable maps X→fY→gZ, there are canonical bundle isomorphisms

id⁡Z∗E≅E,f∗(g∗E)≅(gf)∗E.

They are natural in bundle maps and coherent for three composable base maps. Under them, pullback of sections respects identities and composition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The bundle and composable maps in the statement.

[F1]

Pullbacks are the indicated subspaces of products, and their canonical maps and sections have the displayed coordinate formulas (Pullback vector bundles and sections).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1

The maps (z,e)↦e and e↦(q(e),e) are mutually inverse fiberwise-linear continuous maps id⁡Z∗E⇄E. They are continuous by the product and subspace formulas in [F1].

1.2F1

The composite comparison is α(x,(f(x),e))=(x,e), with inverse (x,e)↦(x,(f(x),e)). Both maps are continuous restrictions of product-coordinate maps, are linear on each fiber, and preserve the defining equations, so [F1] makes them inverse bundle isomorphisms.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2

For a third base map, every route through the associativity comparisons deletes the same redundant base coordinates and ends at the same pair (w,e). For a bundle map, both naturality routes apply that map to the same final e-coordinate. Thus the comparisons are coherent and natural.

3.1F1step 1.1step 1.2∎

The pullback section formula sends x to (x,s(g(f(x)))) whether it is applied once along gf or twice along g and f; the identity formula similarly reduces to s. Hence sections respect identities and composition under the canonical comparisons.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources