Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exterior potential sphere and zero ideal force — conditional physical prediction

Physical scope

Explicit smooth potential on exterior sphere, slip/no-through condition; exact inviscid Euler pressure force zero; not viscous/no-slip. Worked example is the actual explicit field/parameter selection in that section. B leaf cannot supply any later item. Constant density with spatially varying constraint pressure, not barotropic EOS pressure.

Statement

Let a,ρ0>0, p∞∈R, U∈R3, with lengths in metres, velocity in m s−1, density in kg m−3 and pressure in pascals, and Ωa={x∈R3:r=∣x∣>a}. Define n=x/r, Cartesian div⁡u=∂xux+∂yuy+∂zuz, ϕ(x)=(U⋅x)(1+a3/(2r3)), u=∇ϕ, and p=p∞+ρ0(∣U∣2−∣u∣2)/2. In the selected unforced incompressible Euler model these smooth fields solve (u⋅∇)u+ρ0−1∇p=0, div u=0, tend uniformly in direction to U,p∞ at infinity, and have u⋅n=0 at r=a. On the surface the velocity is u=32(U−(U⋅n)n), generally nonzero tangent to the sphere. Thus the boundary is impermeable with slip, not no-slip. For the inviscid stress σE=−pI and sphere normal n=x/a pointing from center into exterior, ∫∣x∣=aσEn dS=−∫∣x∣=apn dS=0. This is an exact inviscid mathematical-model prediction, neither zero viscous drag nor an observed force.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a,ρ0>0, U,p∞, exterior sphere, exact potential and pressure, far field and slip boundary.

[A1]

Single-component nonpolar continuum and material balances: continuum balances are adopted physical inputs, not measured force laws.

[A2]

Specified wall, thermal, periodic and initial data: far-field and impermeability data are separate; no no-slip condition is adopted.

[F1]

Incompressible inviscid Euler model with pressure multiplier: the selected local equations are div u=0 and ρ0Dtu+∇p=0, with inviscid stress σE=−pI.

[F2]

Exterior potential sphere and zero ideal force: the displayed potential sphere field solves steady Euler, has no-through slip, and has zero pressure-only resultant with the stated orientation.

[F3]

Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables: for u=(ux,uy,uz) in Cartesian coordinates, curl⁡u=(∂yuz−∂zuy,∂zux−∂xuz,∂xuy−∂yux); in the smooth potential field the mixed second derivatives commute, giving curl⁡(∇ϕ)=0.

Proof

1.1givenA1A2F1F2F3

The potential field in [F2] is divergence-free, solves the local steady Euler equation in [F1], tends to U, and has zero radial velocity at r=a. For u=∇ϕ, the Cartesian curl convention in [F3] also gives curl⁡u=0 by equality of the mixed second derivatives of the smooth potential. Its tangential surface value is the stated projection; this is slip, not no-slip.

2.1F2step 1.1constructalgebra

On r=a, [F2] gives u=32(U−(U⋅n)n), so ∣u∣2=94(∣U∣2−(U⋅n)2) and pressure depends on n only through (U⋅n)2. Parameterize Sa by Φ(θ,φ)=a(sin⁡θcos⁡φ,sin⁡θsin⁡φ,cos⁡θ), with 0≤θ≤π and 0≤φ≤2π; then dS=a2sin⁡θ dθ dφ. The change (θ,φ)↦(π−θ,φ+π mod 2π) sends Φ to −Φ and preserves this area element because its absolute Jacobian is one and sin⁡(π−θ)=sin⁡θ. Thus it preserves p and reverses n, so the two antipodal contributions cancel and ∫Sapn dS=0.

3.1A2F1step 2.1∎

The resultant uses only σE=−pI and contains no viscous shear term, so it makes no no-slip or viscous-drag claim.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources