Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conditional physical BPS wall crossing from an exact Hall bridge

Physical scope

Conditional identity for the second-helicity BPS index of an already specified pure four-dimensional rigid N=2 SU(2) model at two points of a regular Coulomb-branch patch, provided a finite-quiver presentation with finite charge-degree sublevels and an exact coefficient-, charge-, pairing-, and factor-preserving Hall-to-Hilbert bridge are supplied; it asserts neither that this bridge exists nor a continuum QFT construction.

Statement

Assume ACω as required by the supplied trace-class BPS-index data. Use the selected pure four-dimensional rigid N=2 Yang–Mills model with global gauge group SU(2) and no microscopic matter hypermultiplets, in natural units c=ℏ=1. On a simply connected regular patch U, the local periods a,aD:U→C are holomorphic and satisfy Im⁡(∂aD/∂a)>0. Its formal charge-label lattice is ΓSW=Z2, with zu(ne,nm)=2(nea(u)+nmaD(u)),⟨(ne,nm),(ne′,nm′)⟩DSZ=2(nmne′−nenm′). For each supplied stable one-particle BPS rest sector, Ωu(γ) is the second-helicity trace −12tr⁡Eu,γ ⁣((−1)2J3(2J3)2) from the physical charge-data definition; it is set to zero off the selected stable support. Let u−,u+∈U be two specified points.

The finite-field Hall input is a finite acyclic quiver Q over Fq, where q>1 is a prime power. For integer dimension vectors, define χQ(d,e)=∑i∈Q0diei−∑a:i→jdiej,⟨d,e⟩Q=χQ(d,e)−χQ(e,d),t=q>0.

Suppose an additive map ρ:ZQ0→ΓSW and a physical charge cone Γ+ are supplied, where Γ+ contains 0, is closed under addition and is pointed, such that ρ(NQ0)⊆Γ+. Supply a positive additive degree ℓ:Γ+→N with finite sublevel sets and require ℓ(ρ(d))=∑idi for every d∈NQ0. Assume also, for all d,e∈ZQ0, that

⟨ρ(d),ρ(e)⟩DSZ=⟨d,e⟩Q.

Let H={z∈C:Im⁡z>0}. Choose one real phase rotation α such that for both u∈{u−,u+} the vertex charges Zu(ei)=e−iαzu(ρ(ei)) lie in H, and extend each assignment additively by Zu(d)=∑idiZu(ei)=e−iαzu(ρ(d)). A representation M assigns a finite-dimensional Fq-vector space to each vertex and a linear map to each arrow; its dimension vector is d(M)∈NQ0. The additive central charge Zu(d) was specified above. For nonzero d, set ϕZu(d)=arg⁡Zu(d)/π∈(0,1); this range follows because a nonzero sum of upper-half-plane vertex charges lies in H. For every nonzero dimension vector, the defining equality for Zu identifies ϕZu(d) with arg⁡(e−iαzu(ρ(d)))/π. A nonzero M is Zu-semistable when every nonzero subrepresentation U⊆M satisfies ϕZu(d(U))≤ϕZu(d(M)).

On the isomorphism-class basis δM, the subobject-first Hall product is (f⋆g)(L)=∑U⊆Lf(U)g(L/U), with distinct embedded subobjects counted separately. Complete by total dimension, that is, take the product over dimension vectors of the finite-dimensional homogeneous components. For a phase ϕ, put SZu(ϕ)=δ0+∑[M]≠[0], M Zu-semistable, ϕZu(d(M))=ϕδM, where δ0 is the Hall unit. Its skew integration is J(f)=∑[M]tχQ(d(M),d(M))f(M)∣Aut⁡(M)∣−1xd(M), and the completed skew torus has product xd∗xe=t−⟨e,d⟩Qxd+e. The resulting Hall spectrum generator is the decreasing-phase product PZusk=∗ϕ↘J(SZu(ϕ)), with the largest phase leftmost.

For each of the two specified points define the nonzero index support Σu:={γ∈Γ+∖{0}:Ωu(γ)≠0}. Assume {γ∈ΓSW∖{0}:Ωu(γ)≠0}⊆Γ+ for both specified points, so Σu is the full nonzero index support. Assume {γ∈Σu:ℓ(γ)≤N} is finite for every N≥0, Ωu(γ)∈Z on Σu, and e−iαzu(γ)∈H for every u∈{u−,u+} and γ∈Σu. Thus every phase ϕu(γ)=arg⁡(e−iαzu(γ))/π used below is defined. Zero charge is excluded from Σu and from all phase-indexed products.

Let Kphys be a coefficient field with a field embedding σ:Q(t)→Kphys, and write v:=σ(t) for the dimensionless Hall coefficient parameter. Here Q(t)=Q(q) is the field generated by the specified algebraic number t, so v2=q and v≠1; v is distinct from the physical constant ℏ=1 fixed by natural units. Use the supplied additive degree ℓ:Γ+→N with ℓ(0)=0, ℓ(γ)>0 for γ≠0, and finite sublevel sets. Define the commutative formal charge-series algebra and the quantum charge torus by

A^phys:=∏γ∈Γ+Kphysyγ,yγyδ=yγ+δ,

T^phys:=∏γ∈Γ+KphysYγ,Yγ⋆vYδ=v−⟨δ,γ⟩DSZYγ+δ.

For either algebra and N≥0, let FN consist of series supported on charges γ with ℓ(γ)≥N. Give both algebras the linear topology whose neighborhoods of zero are the FN. Finite sublevel sets make every truncation modulo FN finite-dimensional; the algebras are separated and complete, and their products are degreewise finite. Give T^phys× the subspace topology from T^phys. For each N≥1, let GN be the group of Kphys-algebra automorphisms of A^phys/FN preserving every induced quotient filtration subspace Fj/FN for 1≤j<N, with reduction as the transition maps and the discrete topology on each GN. Define Aut⁡fil(A^phys):=lim←⁡N≥1GN with the inverse-limit topology. It is the group of continuous automorphisms and continuous inverses preserving the degree filtration.

The charge map and coefficient embedding define the degree-continuous torus map, extended from the total-dimension-completed Hall skew torus by continuity,

Φ(xd)=Yρ(d),Φ(cxd)=σ(c)Yρ(d).

The degree identity ℓ(ρ(d))=∑idi for d∈NQ0 ensures this continuity. On the commutative completed charge series, supply a sign refinement ε:Γ+→{±1} with ε(0)=1 and ε(γ+δ)=(−1)⟨γ,δ⟩DSZε(γ)ε(δ). Define the physical KS factor for each γ∈Σu by

Kγ,u(yδ)=yδ(1−ε(γ)yγ)Ωu(γ)⟨δ,γ⟩DSZ.

The integer power is interpreted by its formal binomial series in the degree topology. When charges have equal phase, order their labels lexicographically as integer pairs (ne,nm). Let Su be the composition of these factors over Σu in decreasing phase order, with the largest phase leftmost and the stated lexicographic order within each phase. Finally assume an exact model-specific bridge: there is a continuous group homomorphism Θ:T^phys×⟶Aut⁡fil(A^phys), and for every phase ϕ and either specified point it satisfies, using the same within-phase order, Θ ⁣(Φ(J(SZu(ϕ))))=∏γ∈Σuϕu(γ)=ϕ↘Kγ,u.

Here SZu(ϕ) and J are the semistable phase factor and skew integration from the finite-field Hall definition. Then

Su−=Su+.

This is a conditional transport theorem. The specified per-phase bridge is an additional physical input; neither the finite-field Hall identity nor this theorem asserts that the pure-SU(2) model supplies it, that the resulting index counts exist, or that the model has a continuum quantum-field-theory construction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the physical charge/index datum, the finite acyclic quiver and its finite-field stability data, the charge/pairing map, the completed tori, and the stated bridge maps.

[A1]

Assume Countable Choice, ACω: every at most countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. It is inherited through the supplied trace-class definitions; the finite-field Hall theorem itself is choice-free. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Pure SU(2) physical BPS charge and index data: on a regular patch the formal label lattice is Z2, zu(ne,nm)=2(nea+nmaD), the chosen DSZ form is integral and antisymmetric, and Ωu(γ) is the second-helicity supertrace on the supplied one-particle BPS sector.

[F2]

Finite-quiver Hall spectrum generators: for a finite acyclic quiver over Fq, vertex charges in H define semistable subobject-first factors SZ(ϕ) and the degreewise formal skew generator PZsk=∏ϕ↘J(SZ(ϕ)) in the completion with skew Euler pairing; no physical interpretation is part of this definition.

[F3]

Hall wall crossing preserves the completed spectrum generators: for any finite acyclic Q over Fq and two upper-half-plane vertex-charge assignments, the completed skew generators are equal units. Its inspected proof uses the finite-field HN factorization and continuous skew integration; it proves no physical Hilbert-space identification.

[A2]

The common coefficient embedding σ, charge map ρ, degree condition, and continuous factor-matching homomorphism Θ in the Statement are the exact bridge hypothesis. They include the equality of every Hall phase image with the physical KS factors, not merely a matching of total charge labels.

[A3]

The positive cone, finite degree sublevels of the support, and integral indices in the Statement are assumed so each formal binomial factor and each ordered product is defined degreewise.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the Statement and [F1]–[F3], [A1]–[A3].

1.1F1A3givenalgebra

For a supported charge γ∈Σu, put nδ=Ωu(γ)⟨δ,γ⟩DSZ∈Z. Since ℓ(γ)>0, the binomial expansion of 1−ε(γ)yγ to any integer power is defined degreewise in the stated completion: terms of order k have degree increased by kℓ(γ). Bilinearity gives nδ+δ′=nδ+nδ′, so the formula for Kγ,u is multiplicative on monomials and hence on series by continuity. It fixes yγ because the pairing is alternating, and replacing nδ by −nδ gives its inverse. Every correction term raises degree, so Kγ,u and its inverse preserve each FN and define elements of Aut⁡fil(A^phys). Finite sublevels and local finiteness of Σu ensure each bounded-degree truncation of the ordered composition uses only finitely many input terms and factors. Thus the phase-ordered composition Su is defined in the inverse-limit topology.

1.2A2A3givenalgebra

The formula for Φ preserves products on basis monomials: Φ(xd∗xe)=σ(t)−⟨e,d⟩QYρ(d+e), while Φ(xd)⋆vΦ(xe)=v−⟨ρ(e),ρ(d)⟩DSZYρ(d+e). The pairing identity and σ(t)=v make these expressions equal. The degree identity in the Statement makes Φ continuous on the total-dimension and ℓ-degree completions.

1.3F2F3given

The finite-field hypotheses of [F3] hold for the same Q and the two assignments Zu−,Zu+, since their vertex values lie in H by the common phase rotation. Therefore PZu−sk=PZu+sk as units of the completed Hall skew torus.

2.1A2step 1.2step 1.3

Apply the continuous homomorphism Φ from step 1.2 to the degreewise equality in step 1.3. Equal coefficients remain equal under the coefficient embedding and charge map, so Φ(PZu−sk)=Φ(PZu+sk).

3.1A1A2A3F1F2step 2.1∎

Since Θ is continuous for the stated unit-group and inverse-limit automorphism topologies, applying it to step 2.1 preserves equality. The Hall generator is the decreasing-phase product of the factors J(SZu(ϕ)); multiplicativity of Φ and Θ and the per-phase identity in [A2] therefore identify each image with the corresponding physical phase factor, in the same order. Degreewise continuity and local finiteness in [A3] pass this equality from finite truncations to the full products. The phase condition on Σu ensures every factor used in that bridge is defined, and Σu⊆Γ+∖{0} excludes the undefined zero-charge phase. [F1] supplies the second-helicity index convention, and [A1] records its choice-strength premise. Thus Su−=Su+.

Remarks

The equality above is a model-conditional deduction from a separate finite-field Hall theorem and the explicit per-phase bridge. The physical Witten heat-supertrace item defines a different index interface; no identification of it with the second-helicity trace is used. The Hall proposition's verification record and the current owner proof inspection are kept distinct from the additional physical bridge premise.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources