Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

N=2 Fermion-Shift Ward Contraction

Physical scope

Local algebraic contraction of the adopted two-derivative N=2 fermion shifts in one electric frame, under the source special-geometry locality and quaternionic equivariance hypotheses; it does not prove existence of a supergravity action or a global gauging.

Statement

In the source-normalized MP=1 two-derivative electric-frame N=2 model, let WiAB, NαA, and SAB be its gaugino, hyperino, and gravitino shifts. Define V=(gijˉkΛikΣjˉ+4huvkΛukΣv)LΛ‾LΣ+(UΛΣ−3LΛ‾LΣ)PΛxPΣx, Zx=(−2XΛΣΓPΓx+2ϵxyzPΛyPΣz+4KuvxkΛukΣv)LΛ‾LΣ. Their algebraic contraction is gijˉWiACWˉjˉBC+2NαANˉαB−12SˉACSCB=δAB V+i(σx)ABZx. For the admissible λ=−1 quaternionic geometry satisfying the equivariance relation in the Facts & Assumptions below, Zx=0. Thus this contraction is a pure SU(2) singlet. The physical scalar potential in the transformation normalization of the N=2 model is g2V.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The N=2 shifts and source normalizations of Four-Dimensional N=2 Matter-Coupled Supergravity, regular scalar data of Four-Dimensional N=2 Electric-Frame Scalar Data, MP=1, and a closed admissible electric gauging.

[A1]

Supergravity Conventions And Normalizations fixes four-dimensional Lorentzian Einstein frame, κ42=8πGN=MP−2, and the Einstein–Hilbert coefficient MP2/2. This item uses the source convention MP=1.

[F1]

Four-Dimensional N=2 Matter-Coupled Supergravity fixes the shift definitions, corrected gaugino-shift relative sign, SU(2) and hyperino indices, and the common gauge coupling g.

[F2]

Four-Dimensional N=2 Electric-Frame Scalar Data fixes the special-Kähler g,f,U, quaternionic h,K,ω, electric polarization, and λ=−1 convention. Its section retains both electric and magnetic components, while the gauging data used in this theorem have electric support.

[F3]

Four-Dimensional N=2 Electric-Frame Scalar Data imposes the exact source special-Kähler mixed-shift identity, symplectic locality, gauge closure, quaternionic vielbein product, and equivariance condition 2KuvxkΛukΣv+ϵxyzPΛyPΣz=XΛΣΓPΓx. These are hypotheses on the gauging used below.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

Expanding the two terms in WiAB from [F1], the kΛiLΛ‾ product with its conjugate gives the singlet δABgijˉkΛikΣjˉLΛ‾LΣ. Write sx for the ordinary row-first Pauli matrix in the source and tx=sxT for its mixed-index component matrix, so (tx)AB=(σx)AB in [F3]. The source row-first identity is sxsy=δxyI+iϵxyzsz; hence the two distinct ordered identities are tytx=δxyI+iϵxyztz and txty=δxyI−iϵxyztz. To see the actual contraction order, put E=(ϵAB)=(01−10), ai=kΛiLΛ‾ and bxi=PΛxgijˉfˉjˉΛ. Then the displayed shift is the matrix Wi=E(aiI+isxbxi), and EsxET=−tx. Thus gijˉWiWj‾T has a mixed term itxgijˉ(aibxj‾−bxiaj‾) and a moment-map triplet −iϵxyztzgijˉbxibyj‾. The latter coefficient is gijˉbxibyj‾=PΛxPΣyUΣΛ. Relabeling Λ,Σ and then x,y converts its triplet to +iϵxyzPΛxPΣyUΛΣtz. This explicit relabeling is why the moment-map term written in the source coefficient order UΛΣ uses (sxsy)T=tytx. The singlet part is UΛΣPΛxPΣx by the definition of U. For the triplet part, the symmetric vector-coupling matrix in the identity of [F3] cancels after antisymmetrizing the moment-map indices; the canonical symplectic term vanishes by the electric locality constraint, and the remaining section term is −ϵxyzPΛyPΣzLΛ‾LΣ. The mixed k–P terms reduce by the exact special-Kähler contraction identity in [F3] to −2XΛΣΓPΓxLΛ‾LΣ. Collecting these coefficients yields gijˉWiACWˉjˉBC=δAB ⁣(gijˉkΛikΣjˉLΛ‾LΣ+UΛΣPΛxPΣx)+i(σx)AB ⁣(−2XΛΣΓPΓx−ϵxyzPΛyPΣz)LΛ‾LΣ. The relative sign between the two terms in W is the corrected sign in [F1], and is needed for these mixed terms.

1.2givenF1F2F3algebra

By the typed vielbein identity and conjugate lower-hyperino frame in [F3], UAuαU‾αvB=12huvδAB+i2Kuvx(σx)AB. The corrected shift in [F1] is NαA=2UAuαkΛuLΛ‾, whose conjugate is NˉαB=2U‾αvBkΣvLΣ; the Killing vectors are real on the quaternionic target. Each hyperino shift has coefficient 2 by [F1], so the product with the Ward factor 2 gives an overall coefficient 2⋅2⋅2⋅12=4 in each contraction: 2NαANˉαB=4δABhuvkΛukΣvLΛ‾LΣ+4i(σx)ABKuvxkΛukΣvLΛ‾LΣ. This gives the hyperino singlet and triplet terms without using field equations.

2.1givenF1F2algebra

Multiplying the electric gravitino shift of [F1] by its conjugate gives the ordinary mixed-index order txty=δxyI−iϵxyztz from step 1.1, with prefactor −12(1/2)(1/2)=−3. Electric support of the gauging selects LΛ in this contraction; it does not set the magnetic section components MΛ to zero. This order therefore gives a negative singlet and a positive triplet: −12SˉACSCB=−3δABPΛxPΣxLΛ‾LΣ+3i(σx)ABϵxyzPΛyPΣzLΛ‾LΣ. The factor −3 follows from −12 times the two shift coefficients 1/2 and 1/2.

3.1givenA1F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

Adding the singlets in 1.1, 1.2, and 2.1 gives V. Adding their triplets gives the displayed Zx. By [F3], 2Kkk+ϵPP=XP; hence its triplet coefficient is −2XP+2ϵPP+4Kkk=−2XP+2(ϵPP+2Kkk)=−2XP+2XP=0. Thus Zx=0, leaving the singlet Ward contraction.

Unresolved supplier

The convention input is Supergravity Conventions And Normalizations at the exact four-dimensional Einstein-frame and Planck normalization used above. The result remains conditional on its adopted supergravity framework.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources