Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Canonical weights uniquely maximize finite-state entropy at their mean energy

Physical scope

Finite probability distributions on the declared microstate set at a fixed positive temperature; the result is a conditional variational property of the model and does not derive the physical canonical-preparation postulate.

Statement

Let (Ω,ϵ) be a finite nonempty microstate model, let T>0, and let qx=e−βEx/Z be its canonical probabilities at β=(kBT)−1. Set Eˉ=∑xqxEx. Among all probability vectors r=(rx)x∈Ω with ∑xrx=1 and ∑xrxEx=Eˉ, the dimensionless Shannon entropy h(r):=−∑x:rx>0rxlog⁡rx is uniquely maximized by r=q. The corresponding physical Gibbs entropy is S(r):=kBh(r) in J K−1 and has the same unique maximizer. This is a finite-model variational theorem; it does not establish that a physical sample is prepared canonically.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite nonempty state set with fixed energies Ex in joules, T>0, β=(kBT)−1, the canonical law q, and a competing probability vector r with the same mean energy.

[F1]

Finite statistical microstate model: Ω is finite and nonempty and Ex is fixed.

[F2]

Canonical sampling assumption for finite and normalized statistical models: qx=e−βEx/Z with qx>0 and ∑xqx=1.

[F3]

Finite canonical partition, energy, variance, entropy and free-energy identities: Eˉ=∑xqxEx, log⁡qx=−βEx−log⁡Z, and the physical entropy satisfies S(q)=kB(log⁡Z+βEˉ). Dividing by the positive kB gives h(q)=log⁡Z+βEˉ.

[A1]

The competitor has rx≥0, ∑xrx=1, and ∑xrxEx=Eˉ.

Proof

Given: The finite model, its canonical weights, and a competing probability vector with the same mean.

1.1F2F4A1algebra

For every t>0, [F4] gives log⁡t≤t−1, with equality only at t=1: for t>1, integrate 1/u<1 on (1,t); for 0<t<1, integrate 1/u>1 on (t,1) and reverse the endpoints. For every x with rx>0, apply this to t=qx/rx to obtain rxlog⁡(rx/qx)≥rx−qx. Summing over the support of r gives D:=∑x:rx>0rxlog⁡(rx/qx)≥1−∑x:rx>0qx≥0. Equality forces full support and rx=qx for every state.

2.1F1F2F3A1step 1.1algebra∎

Using [F3] and the fixed-mean condition [A1], D=∑x:rx>0rxlog⁡rx+βEˉ+log⁡Z. Therefore h(r)=βEˉ+log⁡Z−D≤βEˉ+log⁡Z=h(q), so S(r)=kBh(r)≤kBh(q)=S(q). Since kB>0, equality holds only when D=0, which by step 1.1 is equivalent to r=q. This proves the unique maximum of both entropies.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources