Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bulk log-partition pressure for a bounded finite-range lattice model

Physical scope

Finite-alphabet, bounded, translation-invariant finite-range interactions on free cubic lattices with a declared cell volume; the pressure convention is specific to this lattice model and implies no continuum-particle or long-range pressure law.

Statement

Use the finite-alphabet, bounded, translation-invariant finite-range lattice model of Bounded finite-range lattice model, with physical interaction energies in joules, inverse temperature β=(kBT)−1>0, and partition sum ZL(β). Suppose each site represents a fixed cell of volume v0>0 in m3. Define the reduced log-partition density pL=L−dlog⁡ZL and the lattice pressure convention PL=(kBT/v0)pL in pascals. Then pL and PL have finite limits as L→∞. If a second boundary-energy model on the same configuration sets differs pointwise by at most CbLd−1 joules for fixed Cb, it has the same limit.

The pressure convention in this statement is assigned to this lattice model. Equating it with a derivative-based macroscopic pressure or a measured mechanical pressure requires a separate model identification.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite alphabet, finite-range bounded lattice interactions, positive T, the canonical partition sum, and a fixed physical cell volume.

[F1]

Bounded finite-range lattice model: for integer d,L≥1, finite alphabet A, bounded finite-range translation-invariant interactions, and β>0, HL and ZL=∑se−βHL(s) are defined with free boundary.

[F2]

Finite-range lattice log-partition limit (current batch 11 draft): the sequence pL=L−dlog⁡ZL has a finite limit for every fixed β>0, and a boundary-energy perturbation bounded by CbLd−1 has the same limit. Its full current proof was inspected; its draft status remains conditional.

[F3]

SI quantities and unit conventions: kB has units J K−1, T is in kelvins, v0 is in m3, and kBT/v0 is in pascals.

[F4]

Canonical sampling assumption for finite and normalized statistical models: the positive finite lattice partition sum defines the adopted finite-volume canonical law.

[A1]

v0 is fixed as L varies, and the physical interaction parameters are held fixed in the sequence of cubic boxes.

Proof

Given: The bounded finite-range lattice data, β>0, a fixed cell volume, and the stated boundary perturbation bound.

1.1F1F2F4A1

The finite lattice data in [F1] and β>0 match the model hypotheses of [F2]. Thus pL=L−dlog⁡ZL converges to a finite p∞; the same supplier gives the identical limit for the stated boundary perturbation. By [F4], these finite partition sums give the adopted lattice canonical law.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra∎

Since v0 and T are fixed along the volume sequence, multiplying by the constant kBT/v0 preserves convergence: PL=(kBT/v0)pL→(kBT/v0)p∞. The factor has units of pressure by [F3]. This proves only the declared lattice pressure convention.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources