How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Mean work is at least the finite free-energy difference
An inequality for the ensemble-mean work in the finite protocol under the Jarzynski model assumptions; it is not a per-path second-law inequality and is not an empirical statement.
Statement
Under the hypotheses of Jarzynski equality for a finite protocol with stationary kernels, the mean work obeys . The conclusion concerns the path ensemble only; individual paths may have .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-valued work random variable under the forward path law and .
The two-point convexity inequality for the exponential function: is convex on .
Finite Jensen inequality for a convex function and nonnegative weights summing to one: for a finite probability vector and real values , .
The exponential function is strictly increasing: the exponential is strictly increasing on .
Proof
Given: [F1]--[F4].
Apply finite Jensen to the finitely many forward paths with and weights . Then .
Strict increase of the exponential yields . Since , multiplying by reverses the order and gives .