Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local Gibbs and parcel first law in the adopted material

Physical scope

Conditional local-equilibrium continuum material with the supplied C2 fixed-composition state function; local parcel calculus only, not a microscopic finite-particle process or global gravitating extensivity.

Statement

In the adopted fixed-composition local-equilibrium material model of Restricted local equilibrium parcel with adopted material state function, let X⊂(0,∞)×R be its open state domain, let e∈C2(X,R) include the rest-energy contribution, and set T=eσp, p=−ev, ε=ne, and μ=e+pv−Tσp, with n=1/v and s=nσp as in Rest fluid state, frame and geometric current definitions. The model's local state identities are dε=T ds+μ dn,ε+p=Ts+μn,dp=s dT+n dμ. For a local continuum parcel with real extensive marker variable N>0, proper volume V>0, entropy S∈R, and (V/N,S/N)∈X, its adopted energy is E=Ne(V/N,S/N). On this open parcel domain it obeys dE=T dS−p dV+μ dN,E=TS−pV+μN. The count variable is treated continuously as part of the local-equilibrium continuum model; these differentials are not claims about discrete microscopic transitions. The result is conditional model calculus and does not establish that a chosen state function describes a particular material.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty open state domain X⊂(0,∞)×R, a supplied e∈C2(X,R), a state (v,σp)∈X, and a local-equilibrium continuum parcel with N,V>0 and (V/N,S/N)∈X.

[F1]

Restricted local equilibrium parcel with adopted material state function (draft physical postulate): for a selected fixed-composition branch, adopt a supplied C2 state function e(v,σp), T=eσp>0, energy per marker including rest energy, and the parcel assignment E=Ne(V/N,S/N). Its applicability is a model assumption; it asserts no universal or measured equation of state.

[F2]

Local Gibbs, Euler, parcel first law and response identities (draft mathematical supplier): for such an open X and C2 function e, with v=1/n, σp=s/n, T=eσp, p=−ev, ε=ne, and μ=e+pv−Tσp, it states dε=T ds+μ dn, ε+p=Ts+μn, dp=s dT+n dμ, and on the positive open parcel domain it proves dE=T dS−p dV+μ dN and E=TS−pV+μ N. These identities apply at exactly the stated open-domain and C2 hypotheses.

[F3]

Rest fluid state, frame and geometric current definitions: on a nonempty open spacetime set, a C2 state map (v,σp) takes values in a nonempty open X⊂(0,∞)×R and defines n=1/v, s=nσp, ε=ne, T=eσp, p=−ev, and μ=e+pv−Tσp. The local differential calculation below uses this state definition and the adopted material model.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

By the state definitions, de=ev dv+eσp dσp=−p dv+T dσp, while v=1/n and σp=s/n give dv=−dn/n2 and dσp=ds/n−s dn/n2. Therefore dε=d(ne)=e dn+n de=T ds+(e+pv−Tσp) dn=T ds+μ dn. Also ε+p=n(e+pv)=n(Tσp+μ)=Ts+μn.

1.2givenF1F2F3constructalgebra

On the open set D={(S,V,N):V>0,N>0,(V/N,S/N)∈X}, the parcel energy is a C2 composition. Differentiating at fixed other parcel coordinates gives ∂SE=eσp=T, ∂VE=ev=−p, and ∂NE=e−(V/N)ev−(S/N)eσp=e+pv−Tσp=μ. Thus dE=T dS−p dV+μ dN.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Differentiate ε+p=Ts+μn and substitute the first identity in step 1.1. The terms T ds and μ dn cancel, leaving dp=s dT+n dμ. This is a state-function identity on the open domain.

3.1givenF1F3algebra∎

Using μ=e+pv−Tσp and V=Nv, S=Nσp, we have TS−pV+μN=N(Tσp−pv+e+pv−Tσp)=Ne=E. This is a deduction within the adopted continuum material model, not an empirical statement.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources