How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact disk-model Laplace integral and heat capacity
A conditional exact calculation for the adopted continuous genus-zero JT disk density, at fixed and in units. It does not assert a discrete microscopic spectrum, a higher-topology result, a nonperturbative completion, or empirical validity.
Statement
Let and have units of seconds, let be dimensionless, and use units as in the adopted JT disk spectral model. Then has units and the density from that model has units seconds. Define the disk partition function as the Laplace integral
When is finite and positive, define the normalized canonical energy distribution by and its mean energy by . Put and, at fixed , write for the dimensionless canonical heat-capacity coefficient in these units. Then the integral is finite and
These are deductions within the adopted continuous disk model, not claims about an individual microscopic spectrum or nature.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , the units in the Statement, and the definitions of , , , and there.
Adopted JT disk spectral model: in these units, for , as a continuous disk-level model density; no discrete Hamiltonian or completion is supplied.
The Gaussian integral : ; its complete proof squares the integral, evaluates the plane Gaussian in polar coordinates, and selects the positive square root.
Differentiation under an improper multiple integral under an integrable derivative bound: for open and open interval , if and are continuous, one slice is absolutely improperly integrable, and on every compact parameter interval the derivative is bounded by a nonnegative improperly integrable , then every slice is absolutely improperly integrable and .
Change of variable in an improper integral: if is a monotone differentiable surjection between intervals, its derivative is locally Riemann integrable, the proper change-of-variable hypotheses hold on compact truncations, and is locally Riemann integrable on , then and converge simultaneously and are equal when convergent.
Proof
Fix and set . Completing the square gives . The affine map is an increasing bijection ; its proper change-of-variable hypotheses hold on every compact truncation. Thus [F3] and [F1] give . The same calculation gives . Since is even and , its full-line integral is and .
For each compact , and are continuous on . The inequality bounds on by , whose integral is ; the base slice is absolutely integrable by [F1] and [F3] with the increasing bijection , whose derivative is the positive constant . Thus [F2] applies and . Differentiating the closed form in step 1.1 yields .
Let and on . The map is an increasing bijection with ; on each compact truncation its proper change-of-variable hypotheses hold, and is locally continuous. By [A1], the transformed integrand is , whose improper integral is finite by step 2.1. Thus [F3] gives , where . Substitution of step 2.1 gives the stated formula for . It is finite and strictly positive because and the displayed factors are finite and positive.
For on , both and are continuous. On a compact let . Since and , the derivative magnitude is bounded on by a constant times , which has finite integral; the same estimate without the factor gives an integrable base slice. Apply [F2] on to differentiate : . Hence .
At fixed , gives , so . Since and , this coefficient is strictly positive.
Remarks
The proof uses the published Gaussian integral supplier, the improper-substitution theorem for the affine, rescaling, and square substitutions, and the dominated-differentiation theorem for both parameter-dependent improper integrals. The JT density itself remains the adopted premise [A1]. No path-integral or ensemble assumption is used in the calculation.