How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stationary first law from the covariant boundary identity
Conditional first law for a classical stationary nondegenerate bifurcate horizon with the specified covariant potential, globally compatible Noether charge, vanishing linearized constraint variation, and integrable asymptotic Hamiltonian charge. It is not a dynamical law, a quantum result, or empirical confirmation of a gravity model.
Statement
For the stationary Noether data of the preceding Definition, choose in the canonical local representative class of the preceding Noether-charge decomposition theorem. Let be an admitted linearized solution with fixed and . Let be finite oriented smooth singular hypersurface chains with , where the boundary orientations are outward at and inward at . Then on each , and The last equality uses the derivative-free curvature hypothesis and the Noether entropy functional of the preceding theorem. The identity is conditional on the exact boundary-charge and vanishing-constraint assumptions; is the unperturbed surface gravity. For the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian with Newton constant in the same action normalization, it gives , where .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stationary Noether data, the compact boundaryless bifurcation surface and the admitted smooth linearized perturbation in the Statement.
Stationary covariant Noether boundary data: , , , , and . The boundary one-form is exactly and satisfies .
Cartan's magic formula: for every differential form .
Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains: for each finite smooth singular chain and smooth form .
Noether charge decomposition for algebraic-curvature Lagrangians: the selected charge is in the local representative class with .
Stationary horizon Noether-charge entropy variation: for that representative, .
Proof
Differentiate at fixed . Since on the stationary background and is linear in its variation argument, The first equality uses that the coefficient variation of is zero; the second uses because is fixed. Covariance of identifies . Since , Cartan's identity [F1] yields .
By [A1], and . Differentiating this identity gives because is independent of the field variation and the spacetime coordinates. Combining with step 1.1 gives . This conclusion uses the explicit constraint-variation premise; it is not inferred from the closure of a presymplectic current.
Apply [F2] to on . By step 2.1 and , On , , so . Taking the limit in the first term is permitted by the boundary convergence assumption in [A1], and its value is by the specified definition of the Hamiltonian variation. Hence .
By [F3], the charge used here is in the representative class required by [L1]. Apply [L1] to the right-hand side of step 3.1. This gives , with all field variations taken at fixed generator and fixed background .
For , the curvature convention in the preceding entropy-variation theorem gives . Holding fixed and using , the Riemann-symmetric derivative is Its binormal contraction is , because and . Substitution in the definition of yields .
Remarks
The stationary relation is a model deduction. Calling the physical thermodynamic state entropy requires an additional physical identification; the restricted Kerr–Newman assumption on the earlier thermodynamic page is not generalized here.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Vivek Iyer and Robert M. Wald, Some Properties of Noether Charge and a Proposal for Dynamical Black Hole Entropy, §6, equations (73)–(102)
- Geoffrey Compère and Adrien Fiorucci, Advanced Lectures on General Relativity, §§1.3.3–1.4.2
- Daniel Harlow and Jie-qiang Wu, Covariant phase space with boundaries, §§2.2–2.4