How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
full-theory uniqueness source report
Remark
Eberhardt–Levine's Theorem 1.1 reports that every unitary two-dimensional CFT with discrete spectrum is the compact free boson, its reflection orbifold, or one of three exceptional orbifolds by the tetrahedral, octahedral, or icosahedral subgroup of . Their modular-bootstrap theorem is narrower in logical content than that full-theory statement: under A1–A5 it classifies partition-function densities and includes a spurious average of two distinct Narain densities. Sections 4.1–4.4 then use full CFT data, including unitarity, the operator-state correspondence, current Ward identities, OPE/crossing, and invertible or non-invertible gauging arguments, to exclude the spurious average and identify the theories. This item reports what the sources state; it does not formalize or prove the full-theory uniqueness theorem and is not a prerequisite supplier.
Carpi–Gaudio–Giorgetti's Theorem 5.6 classifies simple discrete-series vertex-operator-algebra extensions of as fixed-point algebras for closed subgroups of isomorphic to closed subgroups of . Their Remark 5.7 explicitly says this theorem assumes neither strong rationality nor effective central charge . This is a chiral VOA result, so its scope does not by itself establish the nonchiral full-CFT uniqueness claim above. Their Theorem 5.27 separately assumes strong rationality of ; Remark 5.29 reports a separate preprint proof of that hypothesis, but that cited preprint was not inspected here and is not adopted as an input.
Source-report references
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.