Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

c=1 full-theory uniqueness source report

Remark

Eberhardt–Levine's Theorem 1.1 reports that every unitary two-dimensional cL=cR=1 CFT with discrete spectrum is the compact free boson, its Z2 reflection orbifold, or one of three exceptional SU(2)1 orbifolds by the tetrahedral, octahedral, or icosahedral subgroup of SO(3). Their modular-bootstrap theorem is narrower in logical content than that full-theory statement: under A1–A5 it classifies partition-function densities and includes a spurious average of two distinct Narain densities. Sections 4.1–4.4 then use full CFT data, including unitarity, the operator-state correspondence, current Ward identities, OPE/crossing, and invertible or non-invertible gauging arguments, to exclude the spurious average and identify the theories. This item reports what the sources state; it does not formalize or prove the full-theory uniqueness theorem and is not a prerequisite supplier.

Carpi–Gaudio–Giorgetti's Theorem 5.6 classifies simple discrete-series vertex-operator-algebra extensions of L(1,0) as fixed-point algebras VL2H for closed subgroups H of Aut⁡(VL2) isomorphic to closed subgroups of SO(3). Their Remark 5.7 explicitly says this theorem assumes neither strong rationality nor effective central charge 1. This is a chiral VOA result, so its scope does not by itself establish the nonchiral full-CFT uniqueness claim above. Their Theorem 5.27 separately assumes strong rationality of VL2A5; Remark 5.29 reports a separate preprint proof of that hypothesis, but that cited preprint was not inspected here and is not adopted as an input.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources