How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Under Dependent Choice, a nonempty complete metric space is not a countable union of closed sets with empty interior
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice (). If a nonempty metric space is complete, then it is not the union of a sequence of closed sets each having empty interior. Equivalently, the intersection of countably many open dense subsets of is dense.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Dependent Choice (), closed sets with empty interior, and a nonempty open set .
A complete metric space contains the limit of every Cauchy sequence (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space).
Under the assumed Axiom of Dependent Choice, a serial sequence of states recording each ball together with its centre and positive radius is permitted (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
For every positive real number there is a reciprocal integer smaller than it (For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with ).
Proof
If is empty the assertion is vacuous. Otherwise choose and such that ; openness supplies a ball about in , and a smaller positive radius has this property. Put .
Given and a state with , the open set is nonempty because is closed with empty interior. Choose in that set and small enough that and ; openness and [L3] permit this for each individual state. Thus the relation from to with these properties is serial on the set of triples .
Apply dependent choice to the serial state relation in step 1.2, starting at . Its successive states have first coordinate , so write them and put . The centres and radii are coordinate projections of this single DC sequence, not separately chosen from countably many balls. They satisfy , for , and .
The nesting and the radius bound make Cauchy: for , both and lie in , so their distance is at most twice the radius of , which tends to zero.
Let , supplied by completeness [L1]. For every , the tail lies in the closed set , so .
Thus . Every nonempty open meets this complement, proving both stated formulations.