How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cellular boundary is the incidence degree matrix
Statement
Let be a CW complex. For , in the integral cellular chain groups with the chosen cell orientations,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A CW complex , integral cellular chains, and the chosen cell orientations; the differential is as in Cellular boundary from three consecutive skeleta.
Proof
Project the three-skeleton connecting map defining to the summand of a fixed -cell.
For , first pass from to as required by the relative target of the cellular boundary, and then collapse all summand spheres except that of . Equivalently, collapse the entire complement , including . Naturality of the connecting homomorphism for the characteristic disk identifies the coefficient with the composite from its oriented boundary sphere to this quotient sphere. This is precisely the reduced-homology endomorphism in Incidence number of two CW cells, so its degree is .
For , use a characteristic interval compatible with the chosen edge generator. Its connecting homomorphism is the singular boundary . For each chosen vertex generator , the identity gives coefficient , exactly the incidence number of Incidence number of two CW cells. This includes negatively chosen zero-cell generators and gives zero when both endpoints coincide. The boundary is an element of a direct sum, so only finitely many coefficients are nonzero; equality of all its projections therefore proves the formula for every ; separately, by definition.