How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
BPZ equation from a Virasoro level-two null vector
Statement
Let be a fixed-coordinate sphere Virasoro block family with primary insertions of weights . Suppose that in the chosen module the th primary obeys the actual relation
not merely that this vector is singular in a Verma module. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Virasoro conventions of Virasoro algebra in the convention, a block family as in Fixed-coordinate sphere Virasoro block family, and an actual level-two null relation in the th module.
Stress-tensor Ward identity on the sphere identifies the insertion with the displayed sum over .
Fixed-coordinate sphere Virasoro block family makes translations act by insertion of , for all module states.
The relation holds as equality to zero in the chosen module.
Proof
By [F1], evaluating the block on gives
This is a coefficient identity in the fixed local coordinate .
The actual module relation [A1] gives . Applying the translation property [F2] twice gives ; the modes are fixed operators and the family is holomorphic, so the second derivative is defined. Substitution in step 1.1 and moving the sum to the left proves the BPZ equation.
Remarks
The generic integral- carrier Coinvariants and conformal blocks on a pointed curve is separate formulation context; it supplies neither the actual null relation [A1] nor coordinate descent for fractional weights. Singularity in a Verma module alone is not used in the deduction.