Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Characters on a unital Banach algebra are continuous

Statement

Let A be a nonzero unital complex Banach algebra (Unital Banach algebra) and let χ be a character on A (Character and maximal ideal space). Then:

  1. χ is unital: χ(1)=1;
  2. χ(a)∈σA(a) for every a∈A (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra);
  3. ∣χ(a)∣≤∥a∥ for every a∈A; consequently χ is bounded linear with ∥χ∥=1, and in particular χ is continuous.

No Hahn–Banach theorem, no spectral-radius formula and no existence of characters is used: the argument runs on the Neumann series alone and is a theorem of ZF.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero unital complex Banach algebra A, a character χ on A, and an element a∈A.

[L1]

A is a complex vector space with associative bilinear multiplication, a complete submultiplicative norm, a unit 1 with 1x=x1=x and ∥1∥=1, and 0≠1 because A is nonzero (Unital Banach algebra).

[L2]

A character is nonzero, complex-linear and multiplicative; in particular χ(1⋅1)=χ(1)2 and χ(a⋅1)=χ(a)χ(1) (Character and maximal ideal space).

[L3]

b∈A is invertible exactly when bc=cb=1 for some c∈A, and z∈σA(a) exactly when z1−a is not invertible (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).

[L4]

If ∥y∥<1 then 1−y is invertible, with inverse ∑n≥0yn (Neumann series).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2algebra

χ(1)=χ(1⋅1)=χ(1)2 by multiplicativity [L2], so χ(1)∈{0,1}; if χ(1)=0 then χ(a)=χ(a⋅1)=χ(a)χ(1)=0 for every a, contradicting that χ is nonzero [L2], so χ(1)=1.

2.1step 1.1L2L3

Put λ:=χ(a) and suppose λ∉σA(a), so that a−λ1 is invertible with two-sided inverse b [L3]. Then 1=χ(1)=χ(b(a−λ1))=χ(b)(χ(a)−λχ(1))=χ(b)⋅0=0 by [step 1.1], [L2] and linearity, a contradiction; hence χ(a)∈σA(a).

3.1step 2.1L1L3L4algebra

Suppose ∣λ∣>∥a∥ where λ=χ(a). Then ∥a/λ∥=∥a∥/∣λ∣<1, so 1−a/λ is invertible by [L4], and therefore λ1−a=λ(1−a/λ) is invertible with inverse λ−1(1−a/λ)−1; by [L3] this says λ∉σA(a), contradicting [step 2.1]. Hence ∣χ(a)∣≤∥a∥ for every a∈A.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1L1∎

By [step 1.1] χ(1)=1 and by [step 3.1] ∣χ(a)∣≤∥a∥ for all a, so χ is bounded linear with ∥χ∥≤1; since ∥1∥=1 and χ(1)=1, ∥χ∥=1. Every bounded linear map between normed spaces is continuous, so χ is continuous.

Remarks

  • The unit hypothesis streamlines the proof, but continuity survives without it. For a nonzero unital Banach algebra the computation χ(1)2=χ(1) forces unitality. A character on a nonunital Banach algebra B extends to the algebraic sum-norm unitization C⊕B, with product (λ,a)(μ,b)=(λμ,λb+μa+ab), by χ+(λ,a)=λ+χ(a). This is a unital character on a unital Banach algebra, so the theorem applied to χ+ shows that the original character is continuous as well.
  • Choice-free. Steps 1.1–2.2 use only the algebra axioms, the definition of the spectrum and the Neumann series; no selection from nonempty sets and no separation theorem occurs.
  • Where the bound is used. Part 3 is what puts Δ(A) inside the dual unit ball and identifies the pointwise-evaluation topology with the weak-star subspace topology; this is the standard automatic-continuity statement for characters.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources