How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points
Statement
Let , with closure as in Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of and derived set as in Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of . Write
for the set of adherent points of (The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of ). Then:
- .
- .
- is the smallest closed superset of : it is closed, it contains , and it is contained in every closed with .
- is closed if and only if , if and only if .
Claim 3 is the content of the definition of and is restated here so that the four descriptions stand together; claims 1, 2 and 4 are the ones that carry work.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A subset , and the set of adherent points of as displayed in the Statement.
is open when every admits with ; is closed when is open (Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen).
; ; and if then and (The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of ).
is the intersection of the nonempty family of closed supersets of ; it is closed, it contains , and it is contained in every closed superset of (Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of , Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open subsets of are open, and dually for closed sets).
is an adherent point of when every meets , a limit point when every meets , and is the set of limit points (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of ).
Proof
: for and any one has , so that intersection is nonempty.
Let ; by the definition of there is a real with .
Let be closed with , and let ; since is open there is a real with .
For every the radius is positive and , so and ; hence , and since was an arbitrary point of that set is open, that is, is closed.
From we get , so ; hence , that is, , for every closed .
By steps 1.1 and 2.1 the set is a closed superset of , so by the leastness in [L3]; and is itself a closed superset of by [L3], so step 2.2 applied to gives . Hence , which is claim 1.
: if and then for every some exists, and because , so and ; conversely by step 1.1, and because . Combining with step 3.1 gives , which is claim 2.
Claim 4: if is closed then is a closed superset of itself, so by [L3], while by [L3], whence ; conversely if then is closed because is. Finally says by step 4.1, and holds exactly when .
Claim 3 is [L3] restated, and claims 1, 2 and 4 are steps 3.1, 4.1 and 5.1, so all four hold.
Remarks
-
Which claim does the work in practice. Claim 1 is the one used almost everywhere below: to show a point lies in one exhibits, for each , a point of within of it. Claim 2 is what separates the two ways a point can be adherent, by membership or by accumulation, and it is what makes the notion of an isolated point visible.
-
No special property of is used. The argument uses the definitions of open, closed, neighbourhood and closure, and the order enters only through the nesting property of neighbourhoods; neither the least-upper-bound property nor the Archimedean property appears at any step. The results of this page that do use them are flagged in Which results on this page use the order of and therefore have no general-topological analogue.
-
The sequential form is a separate theorem and costs more. Replacing "every neighbourhood meets " by "some sequence in converges to " is A point lies in the closure of iff some sequence in converges to it, so a subset of is closed iff it is sequentially closed, and the passage from the first to the second spends the axiom of countable choice, since it selects one point of from each of infinitely many neighbourhoods. The characterisation proved above is choice free.
Depends on
Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of
Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of
Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen
Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open subsets of are open, and dually for closed sets
The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of