Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming countable choice, every measure space has a unique complete extension to its completion

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let (X,A,μ) be a measure space, and let (X,A‾,μ‾) be its completion construction. Then μ‾ is a complete measure on A‾ extending μ. It is the unique complete measure on A‾ that extends μ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A measure space (X,A,μ) and the Axiom of Countable Choice.

[L1]

The completion domain is a sigma-algebra containing A (Assuming countable choice, the completion domain is a sigma-algebra).

[L2]

The value μ‾(E)=μ(A) is independent of the measurable core in a completed representation (The completed measure is independent of the representing measurable set).

[L3]

Countable unions of measurable null sets are null, and completeness makes all their subsets measurable and null (Null sets are closed under countable unions and, in a complete space, under arbitrary subsets).

[L4]

A measure vanishes at the empty set and is countably additive on disjoint measurable sequences (Measures on sigma-algebras).

[L5]

Countable choice selects witnesses from each nonempty natural-number-indexed family (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[L6]

Every member of the completion domain has a representation E=A∪N with A measurable and N contained in a measurable null set, and the proposed completed value is μ(A) (The completion domain and proposed completed set function of a measure space).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2L4

By [L1] and [L2], μ‾ is a function on the sigma-algebra A‾, and μ‾(A)=μ(A) for A∈A by the representation A=A∪∅; in particular μ‾(∅)=0.

1.2givenL3L5L6choose

Let (Ek) be disjoint in A‾. By [L6] each family of completed representations is nonempty, so [L5] chooses Ek=Ak∪Nk with measurable Ak⊆Ek and Nk contained in a measurable null set Zk. Then the Ak are disjoint, ⋃kEk=(⋃kAk)∪N with N⊆⋃kZk, and ⋃kZk is null by [L3].

1.3givenL2L3L6

If E∈A‾ and μ‾(E)=0, choose a representation E=A∪N from [L6] with N⊆Z null. Then A∪Z is measurable and null, and every S⊆E is represented by the empty measurable core plus the sub-null set S⊆A∪Z.

1.4givenL2L3L4L6

Let λ be any complete measure on A‾ extending μ. For a representation E=A∪N from [L6], with N⊆Z and μ(Z)=0, one has λ(Z)=0 and completeness gives λ(N)=0. Replacing N by N∖A makes the union disjoint without changing E, so finite additivity gives λ(E)=λ(A)=μ(A)=μ‾(E).

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L2L4

Countable additivity of μ applied to the measurable cores in step 1.2 gives μ‾(⋃kEk)=μ(⋃kAk)=∑kμ(Ak)=∑kμ‾(Ek); with step 1.1, this proves that μ‾ is a measure.

2.2step 1.3L2L3

Step 1.3 shows that every subset of every μ‾-null set belongs to A‾ and has value 0, so the completed measure space is complete.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2step 1.4∎

Steps 2.1, 2.2 and 1.4 prove respectively that μ‾ is an extending measure, is complete, and is the unique complete extension on A‾.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources