How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Universal mapping property of the tensor product of commutative algebras
Statement
Let be commutative -algebras. For every pair of -algebra homomorphisms and , there is a unique -algebra homomorphism
such that and . It is given by
Thus , with its two canonical maps, is the coproduct of and among commutative -algebras.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Commutative -algebras and -algebra maps , .
The tensor product algebra has multiplication and identity (The tensor product of -algebras has multiplication ).
Balanced pairings induce unique homomorphisms from tensor products (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).
An elementary-tensor formula descends exactly when the corresponding pairing is balanced (A formula on elementary tensors defines a homomorphism exactly when its underlying pairing is balanced).
Proof
The canonical maps and are -algebra homomorphisms: [L1] gives their multiplication and identity laws, and and show compatibility with the structure maps.
The pairing is -bilinear: additivity is distributivity in , and because is commutative and both maps respect .
By [L2] and [L3], step 1.2 induces a unique -linear map satisfying .
On pure tensors, [L1] gives , where commutativity of permits the middle factors to switch; hence is multiplicative.
One has , , and , so is an -algebra homomorphism with the required restrictions.
If has the same restrictions, then by [L1], so . The underlying group homomorphisms consequently induce the same balanced pairing, and uniqueness in [L2] gives .
Step 1.1 supplies the two coproduct maps, and steps 2.1 through 4.1 prove the asserted universal mapping property.