Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Soundness and termination of finite partition enclosures

Statement

Let X be finite and nonempty, let w:X→(0,∞) be an exact finite positive weight, and let f:X→R be a finite observable. Suppose the finite rational input intervals in the definition of alg-csm-frontier-interval-finite-partition contain every exact w(x) and f(x). The algorithm terminates after finitely many operations. If it returns finite intervals Z and N, then they contain Z=∑x∈Xw(x) and N=∑x∈Xw(x)f(x), respectively. If it also returns an expectation interval E, then its denominator interval has positive lower endpoint and E contains the exact normalized expectation ∑xπ(x)f(x)=N/Z, where π(x)=w(x)/Z. An overflow, non-finite operation, or nonpositive denominator lower endpoint produces an unresolved status and carries no normalized-expectation enclosure claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact finite positive weights and finite observable on the enumerated nonempty state space, the certified rational input intervals, and the algorithm's finite or unresolved return branch.

[F1]

Certified finite partition and expectation enclosure: the procedure converts rational input endpoints outward, constructs finite interval sums for weights and weighted observables, and divides only when the partition interval's lower endpoint is positive.

[F2]

Dyadic floating-point format and directed rounding: for an exact rational intermediate within the finite range, directed rounding returns a greatest representable lower endpoint and a least representable upper endpoint; overflow is reported and has no finite-error claim.

[F3]

Real intervals, complex rectangles and ball enclosures: a finite expression DAG is a finite directed acyclic graph with input and constant nodes; sharing a node reuses the same exact intermediate value.

[F4]

Outward-rounded interval, rectangle and ball operations: addition, subtraction, multiplication, division away from zero, and squaring use the stated exact endpoint hulls followed by downward and upward endpoint rounding; division by an interval containing zero returns a split or unresolved status rather than a finite quotient.

[F5]

Directed dyadic rounding encloses with explicit underflow and overflow bounds: each finite directed endpoint rounding brackets the exact real endpoint; overflow is explicitly not a finite enclosure result.

[F6]

Finite real interval operations enclose their exact values: for a finite acyclic expression DAG whose input and constant intervals enclose their values, each finite computed node interval encloses its exact value, including reused shared nodes.

Proof

Given: [F1]–[F6] and the certified finite rational input intervals in the Statement.

1.1F1F2F3F5givenconstruct

The finite enumeration supplies one input interval for each exact weight and observable. By [F2] and [F5], when endpoint conversion is finite, rounding the lower endpoint down and upper endpoint up preserves containment of each input interval; if conversion overflows, the algorithm returns unresolved and the theorem makes no finite-enclosure claim. The partition sum and weighted sum are finite acyclic expression DAGs by [F1] and [F3].

2.1F3F4F6step 1.1given

Order the nodes of each finite DAG topologically. Each input node encloses its exact value by step 1.1. At every operation node with a finite result, [F4] gives the interval extension prescribed for that operation and [F6] proves that its value encloses the exact operation on the predecessor values. Induction over the finite node order therefore places Z in Z and N in N whenever those intervals are returned.

3.1F1F3F4F6step 2.1givenalgebraconstruct∎

The exact partition sum satisfies Z>0 because X is nonempty and every w(x)>0. If the returned lower endpoint of Z is positive, then 0∉Z and [F4] defines outward interval division; applying [F6] to this final operation gives N/Z∈N/Z=E. If the lower endpoint is nonpositive, or any operation is non-finite, [F1] returns an unresolved status and no quotient enclosure is claimed. Finally, the procedure performs finitely many conversions and finitely many operations because X is finite, and every operation returns a finite interval or a status; hence it terminates.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources