How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Diffusive heat limit for symmetric exclusion
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix , , and for each integer let be the SSEP on with rate on each unordered nearest-neighbor bond, started from any initial probability vector on a probability space . Write for its empirical measure. Suppose a measurable satisfies, for every real-valued smooth periodic and every ,
where the probability spaces may depend on . Let be the unique weak heat solution on with initial datum , defined by the Fourier heat profile. Then for every real-valued smooth periodic and every ,
Statement references
Symmetric exclusion process under diffusive scaling
Weak heat solutions on the continuum torus
Fourier heat flow on the continuum torus
SSEP empirical-field martingale and bracket
SSEP martingale for time-dependent test functions
Finite-horizon L2 maximal bound for martingales with right-continuous paths and left limits
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; a fixed and finite ; for each an SSEP process with arbitrary initial law; a measurable density with ; and convergence in probability of the initial empirical measures against every real-valued smooth periodic test.
Assume the Axiom of Choice, meaning every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. The finite-chain realization, martingale bracket, and finite-horizon Doob suppliers below carry this assumption (The Axiom of Choice).
Symmetric exclusion process under diffusive scaling: has normalized product Haar measure; bonds are unordered, each allowed swap has rate , is a finite positive measure of total mass at most , and is the displayed second-difference operator.
Fourier heat flow on the continuum torus: with and , for and ; this Fourier series is absolutely convergent for smooth . The supplier also proves that is the unique weak heat solution, , that is smooth on each compact with uniformly bounded derivatives of every fixed order, that , and that with conserved mass.
SSEP martingale for time-dependent test functions: for smooth , the empirical-field martingale with drift has bracket bounded by .
SSEP empirical-field martingale and bracket: for fixed smooth , is a square-integrable martingale whose bracket is bounded by .
Finite-horizon L2 maximal bound for martingales with right-continuous paths and left limits: a square-integrable càdlàg martingale with satisfies .
Proof
Fix and a real-valued smooth periodic . For every , is real-valued: since is real, , and the Fourier multiplier is real and unchanged by ; pairing the absolutely convergent and terms (with the zero mode real) gives a real sum. By [F2], these functions are smooth, so is an admissible real-valued test in [F3]. Denote its martingale by . By [F2], . The time-dependent martingale identity at its terminal time gives , and starts at zero with terminal second moment equal to the expected bracket.
The fourth spatial derivatives of are uniformly bounded for by [F2]. Taylor's formula for each symmetric second difference therefore gives . Since , the drift-error integral in step 1.1 is at most . By [F3], , so Chebyshev's inequality makes that martingale term tend to zero in probability. Step 1.1 establishes that is real-valued, and [F2] gives its smoothness; hence the initial-profile assumption applies to this test. Also [F2] gives . Thus for each fixed , in probability.
If , the conclusion is the initial-profile assumption. Suppose and fix a finite time mesh . Step 2.1 and a finite union bound imply in probability.
By the fundamental theorem of calculus applied twice to each centered second difference, for all . The fixed-test martingale in [F4] gives for all . By [F4], ; [F5] therefore implies in probability. Also [F2] and the mass bound show is Lipschitz with constant . Given , choose a finite mesh with spacing at most ; the supremum error is bounded by the maximum mesh error from step 3.1, , and . First let and then . This proves the stated uniform-in-time convergence in probability.
Remarks
The result is a mathematical deduction from the adopted finite stochastic model; it reports no measured diffusion and derives no Navier–Stokes equation from Newtonian mechanics. If one assigns a microscopic bond rate before the time acceleration and a physical lattice spacing , then the accelerated rate is and the single-particle variance rate in each coordinate is . Thus the normalized coefficient corresponds to with physical units of length squared per time; this is a unit conversion for this chosen model.