Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Diffusive heat limit for symmetric exclusion

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix d≥1, T≥0, and for each integer N≥3 let (ηtN)0≤t≤T be the SSEP on ΛN=(Z/NZ)d with rate N2 on each unordered nearest-neighbor bond, started from any initial probability vector on a probability space (ΞN,AN,PN). Write πtN=N−d∑x∈ΛNηxN(t)δx/N for its empirical measure. Suppose a measurable ρ0:Td→[0,1] satisfies, for every real-valued smooth periodic G and every ϵ>0,

PN ⁣(∣⟨π0N,G⟩−∫Tdρ0(x)G(x) dx∣>ϵ)⟶0(N→∞),

where the probability spaces may depend on N. Let ρt be the unique weak heat solution on Td with initial datum ρ0, defined by the Fourier heat profile. Then for every real-valued smooth periodic G and every ϵ>0,

PN ⁣(sup⁡0≤t≤T∣⟨πtN,G⟩−∫Tdρt(x)G(x) dx∣>ϵ)⟶0(N→∞).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; a fixed d≥1 and finite T≥0; for each N≥3 an SSEP process with arbitrary initial law; a measurable density ρ0 with 0≤ρ0≤1; and convergence in probability of the initial empirical measures against every real-valued smooth periodic test.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice, meaning every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. The finite-chain realization, martingale bracket, and finite-horizon Doob suppliers below carry this assumption (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Symmetric exclusion process under diffusive scaling: Td=(R/Z)d has normalized product Haar measure; bonds are unordered, each allowed swap has rate N2, πtN is a finite positive measure of total mass at most 1, and ΔN is the displayed second-difference operator.

[F2]

Fourier heat flow on the continuum torus: with ek(x)=e2πik⋅x and G^(k)=∫Ge−k dx, PrG=∑k∈Zde−4π2∣k∣2rG^(k)ek for r>0 and P0G=G; this Fourier series is absolutely convergent for smooth G. The supplier also proves that ρt is the unique weak heat solution, ∫ρtG=∫ρ0PtG, that PtG is smooth on each compact [0,T]×Td with uniformly bounded derivatives of every fixed order, that ∂tPtG=ΔPtG, and that 0≤ρt≤1 with conserved mass.

[F3]

SSEP martingale for time-dependent test functions: for smooth Hs, the empirical-field martingale with drift ∂sHs+ΔNHs has bracket bounded by TN−d∑isup⁡s∥∂iHs∥∞2.

[F4]

SSEP empirical-field martingale and bracket: for fixed smooth G, ⟨πtN,G⟩−⟨π0N,G⟩−∫0t⟨πsN,ΔNG⟩ds is a square-integrable martingale whose bracket is bounded by tN−d∑i∥∂iG∥∞2.

[F5]

Finite-horizon L2 maximal bound for martingales with right-continuous paths and left limits: a square-integrable càdlàg martingale M with M0=0 satisfies E[sup⁡0≤t≤T∣Mt∣2]≤4E∣MT∣2.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3algebra

Fix t∈[0,T] and a real-valued smooth periodic G. For every r≥0, PrG is real-valued: since G is real, G^(−k)=G^(k)‾, and the Fourier multiplier e−4π2∣k∣2r is real and unchanged by k↦−k; pairing the absolutely convergent k and −k terms (with the zero mode real) gives a real sum. By [F2], these functions are smooth, so Hs=Pt−sG is an admissible real-valued test in [F3]. Denote its martingale by MsN,t. By [F2], ∂sHs=−ΔHs. The time-dependent martingale identity at its terminal time gives ⟨πtN,G⟩=⟨π0N,PtG⟩+MtN,t+∫0t⟨πsN,(ΔN−Δ)Pt−sG⟩ ds, and MN,t starts at zero with terminal second moment equal to the expected bracket.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

The fourth spatial derivatives of Pt−sG are uniformly bounded for 0≤s≤t by [F2]. Taylor's formula for each symmetric second difference therefore gives sup⁡s,x∣(ΔN−Δ)Pt−sG(x)∣≤CG,TN−2. Since πsN(Td)≤1, the drift-error integral in step 1.1 is at most tCG,TN−2. By [F3], EN∣MtN,t∣2≤CG,T′N−d, so Chebyshev's inequality makes that martingale term tend to zero in probability. Step 1.1 establishes that PtG is real-valued, and [F2] gives its smoothness; hence the initial-profile assumption applies to this test. Also [F2] gives ∫ρ0PtG=∫ρtG. Thus for each fixed t, ⟨πtN,G⟩→∫ρtG in probability.

3.1step 2.1construct

If T=0, the conclusion is the initial-profile assumption. Suppose T>0 and fix a finite time mesh 0=t0<⋯<tm=T. Step 2.1 and a finite union bound imply max⁡j∣⟨πtjN,G⟩−∫ρtjG∣→0 in probability.

4.1A1F2F4F5step 3.1algebra∎

By the fundamental theorem of calculus applied twice to each centered second difference, ∥ΔNG∥∞≤KG:=∑i∥∂iiG∥∞ for all N. The fixed-test martingale in [F4] gives ∣⟨πtN,G⟩−⟨πsN,G⟩∣≤KG∣t−s∣+2sup⁡0≤u≤T∣MuN,G∣ for all s,t∈[0,T]. By [F4], E∣MTN,G∣2≤TN−d∑i∥∂iG∥∞2; [F5] therefore implies sup⁡u≤T∣MuN,G∣→0 in probability. Also [F2] and the mass bound ∫ρt≤1 show t↦∫ρtG is Lipschitz with constant ∥ΔG∥∞. Given δ>0, choose a finite mesh with spacing at most δ; the supremum error is bounded by the maximum mesh error from step 3.1, 2sup⁡∣MN,G∣, and (KG+∥ΔG∥∞)δ. First let N→∞ and then δ↓0. This proves the stated uniform-in-time convergence in probability.

Remarks

The result is a mathematical deduction from the adopted finite stochastic model; it reports no measured diffusion and derives no Navier–Stokes equation from Newtonian mechanics. If one assigns a microscopic bond rate 1/τ0 before the N2 time acceleration and a physical lattice spacing ℓ0/N, then the accelerated rate is N2/τ0 and the single-particle variance rate in each coordinate is 2(N2/τ0)(ℓ0/N)2=2ℓ02/τ0. Thus the normalized coefficient D=1 corresponds to D=ℓ02/τ0 with physical units of length squared per time; this is a unit conversion for this chosen model.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources