How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Full uniform phase shell has vanishing specific canonical KL
Statement
Assume AC and the hypotheses and notation of Total-energy concentration and controlled canonical windows. Let be the finite phase reference of Interacting marked phase-space and reference measures, let be the constructed band, and set . Let be the full fixed- canonical probability. Then satisfies . This is a mathematical statement about a normalized measure restriction; it does not assert or global total-variation convergence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the finite-reference phase measure, the canonical law, stability, and the window hypotheses.
AC is used by the conditional entropy chain rule (The Axiom of Choice).
Total-energy concentration and controlled canonical windows: , , and is a finite positive-reference-measure energy band at fixed .
Interacting marked phase-space and reference measures: relative to phase reference , has density ; by the definition in the Statement, .
Relative Entropy of Probability Measures and Conditional entropy chain and disjoint-block bounds: relative entropy is nonnegative and the exact directional convention is .
Proof
Given: The hypotheses and supplier definitions above.
On A_n, the density of M_n^ph relative to C_n^ph is Z_n e^{bH}/R_n(A_n). Therefore The lower band edge gives
The upper band edge gives . Substituting the step 1.1 lower bound for yields Relative entropy is nonnegative by [F3]; since and by [F1], this proves .