How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cup-i coboundary identity
Statement
For mod-two cochains and and every integer ,
where for . The same identity holds in either relative variant of the cup- product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A fixed natural higher-diagonal system and cochains of the displayed degrees.
Cup- is evaluation of on , and negative indices are zero (Higher cup-i products).
The higher diagonals satisfy , with interchanging the two tensor factors (Natural higher diagonal approximations).
Proof
If , every cup product in the asserted formula has negative index, so [F1] makes both sides zero. Hence assume and evaluate the left side on a chain of degree . By the cochain-coboundary convention,
Substitute the higher-diagonal recurrence. Over it gives
Expand the two terms. The tensor coboundary has no surviving signs over , so its first term is . Since , the second is . This proves the identity on every chain. The carrier property keeps every term relative when either input is relative. For , both negative-index terms are zero and the formula reduces to the ordinary cup-product Leibniz identity.