How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
De Rham integration is a cochain map
Statement
For every smooth manifold , possibly with boundary, integration is a real cochain map from its de Rham complex to its smooth singular cochain complex: Both complexes are zero in negative degrees. The boundary convention for forms is the one in the definition of .
Facts & Assumptions
De Rham integration cochain defines by integration and proves its real linearity in each degree, including the zero-map conventions.
Stokes theorem for smooth singular chains gives for a smooth -chain and a -form with .
Smooth singular chain and cochain complexes defines , without an extra sign.
Proof
Given: A manifold , , a form and an arbitrary finite smooth -chain .
The definition of the cochain differential, followed by integration and [F2], gives The same coefficients and alternating boundary signs occur in [F2] and [F3], so no sign adjustment is required.
Since step 1.1 holds for every chain, the two linear functionals are equal. Together with the degreewise real linearity in [F1], this is precisely the cochain-map identity. For it is the fundamental-theorem formula for values at the two endpoints of each smooth one-simplex, including constant paths. For , the form is zero, and the same equality proves without assuming there are no higher-dimensional singular simplices.
If or , the form and all relevant source differentials are zero, so the identity is an equality of zero cochains; this includes the map out of degree minus one. If is empty, both complexes are zero. Zero chains and degenerate simplices were included in [F2], so they create no exception to step 1.1. Every evaluation uses a finite chain and a previously well-defined integral; no choice axiom enters.