TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For every square matrix, including singular ones, a row swap negates the determinant, scaling a row by any scalar scales it, and row addition leaves it unchanged

Statement

Let $n \geq 1$ and let $A \in M_{n} (R)$ be a matrix over a commutative ring.

Interchanging two rows changes $\det (A)$ to $- \det (A)$ .
Multiplying one row by any $c \in R$ changes it to $c \det (A)$ .
Adding $c$ times one row to a distinct row leaves it equal to $\det (A)$ .

No invertibility assumption is made on $A$ or on $c$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A square matrix $A$ over a commutative ring and a row transformation.

[L1]

Determinant is alternating and multilinear in its rows (The determinant is alternating and multilinear in the rows as well as in the columns).

[L2]

Ring row transformations include swaps, scaling by any scalar, and addition of a multiple of a distinct row (Row swaps, arbitrary row scalings and row additions over a commutative ring, with reversible elementary cases distinguished).

[L3]

Determinant takes values in the same commutative ring (For $n \geq 1$ , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and $∣ \det A ∣$ for a real matrix).

Proof

technique · direct

1.1L1L2L3

Row multilinearity gives $\det (\dots, c R_{p}, \dots) = c \det (A)$ for every scalar $c$ , including $c = 0$ and zero divisors.

2.1step 1.1L1L2

Row antisymmetry gives $\det (A^{'}) = - \det (A)$ when $A^{'}$ is obtained by a row swap.

3.1step 2.1L1L2algebra

Replacing $R_{p}$ by $R_{p} + c R_{q}$ expands the new determinant as $\det (A) + c D$ , where $D$ has row $R_{q}$ in both positions $p$ and $q$ ; alternation gives $D = 0$ , so the determinant is unchanged.

4.1step 3.1∎

The derivations used only row multilinearity and alternation, not cancellation, matrix invertibility or scalar invertibility. Hence all three formulas include singular matrices and arbitrary scalars.

For every square matrix, including singular ones, a row swap negates the determinant, scaling a row by any scalar scales it, and row addition leaves it unchanged

Statement

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources