How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For the set of points of at which is discontinuous is the intersection with of an subset of , and the set of points at which is continuous is the intersection with of a subset; for the two sets are and outright
Statement
Throughout, denotes the canonical copies. Natural numbers, integers and rationals are written directly when used in real arithmetic.
Let and let . Write
(Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, Discontinuity at a domain point: removable, jump and essential cases, and the first- and second-kind grouping). Then:
- Pointwise exhaustion. (The oscillation of on a set and the oscillation at a point, both taken in the extended reals), and is the union of the increasing sequence of superlevel sets (The canonical natural of a field), whose thresholds are .
- Descriptive form. There is an set and a set ( and subsets of ) with and may be taken to be with each a closed subset of cutting down on to the -th set of claim 1 (For every real the set is the intersection with of a closed subset of ; in particular it is closed in when ).
In particular, when the discontinuity set is an subset of and the continuity set is a subset, and claim 1 reads .
Claim 1 is stated separately because it is what later arguments cite downstream. The exhaustion of by the superlevel sets is exactly the form needed when a later proof establishes a property one threshold at a time, so the identity itself is recorded here and not only the descriptive conclusion of claim 2.
The statement is relative on purpose. For a general domain the sets and are subsets of , and neither is or in in general; what the proof produces are two subsets of that cut down to them. The absolute form is stated only for , which is the case used later by the realization and exact-continuity-set examples.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and a function .
is continuous at if and only if ; and for every ( is continuous at if and only if , The oscillation of on a set and the oscillation at a point, both taken in the extended reals, The extended real line , its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined).
For every real there is a closed with (For every real the set is the intersection with of a closed subset of ; in particular it is closed in when ).
For every real there is a natural with , where is identified with its canonical real value; and the natural numbers are positive in and their order is preserved there (For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with , The canonical natural of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).
A subset of is when it is the union of a sequence of closed sets and when it is the intersection of a sequence of open sets; is if and only if is ( and subsets of , Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen).
Proof
For each put , a positive real since , and let be closed with .
: a point is a discontinuity exactly when , and always, so exactly when .
. Let , so . If then . Otherwise , so is a positive real, and there is a natural with ; writing with gives , hence .
Conversely : if then , so .
Put , an subset of since each is closed and the family is indexed by . Then .
Claim 1 is proved: by step 1.2, and by steps 2.1 and 2.2, since is by step 1.1 exactly the set with . The union is increasing, since gives and hence .
Put , a subset of . Then .
Claim 2 is proved by steps 3.1 and 4.1; and for the two identities read and , so is and is outright.
Remarks
-
The exhaustion is indexed from and the thresholds are . contains , so the sequence of thresholds is and never , which is not defined. Writing the union as names the same family; the form above is used because a sequence in this library is a function on .
-
The converse holds and is proved separately. Every subset of is the continuity set of some function (Every subset of is the set of continuity points of some , so the sets are exactly the continuity sets), so the two classes coincide exactly. What the present theorem contributes is the direction that constrains: no function can have a continuity set that fails to be , and No function is continuous at every rational and discontinuous at every irrational, because is not spends that on .
Depends on
The oscillation of on a set and the oscillation at a point, both taken in the extended reals
is continuous at if and only if
For every real the set is the intersection with of a closed subset of ; in particular it is closed in when
and subsets of
Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen
For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with
Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
The extended real line , its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined
The canonical natural of a field
Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing
Discontinuity at a domain point: removable, jump and essential cases, and the first- and second-kind grouping