Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Canonical bundle of a Weierstrass hypersurface

Statement

Let B be a smooth complex algebraic variety, let Ban be its associated complex manifold, and let L→Ban be a holomorphic line bundle. Let p:W→Ban and Y⊂W be the analytic weighted projective bundle and hypersurface defined in Weierstrass model over a line bundle, with equation y2=x3+fxz4+gz6, f∈H0(Ban,L⊗4), and g∈H0(Ban,L⊗6). The hypersurface lies in the smooth locus of W and is Cartier there, so its analytic dualizing sheaf ωY is invertible. It satisfies ωY≅pY∗(KBan⊗L), where pY:Y→Ban is the projection and KBan:=det⁡ΩBan/C1 is the holomorphic canonical line bundle. In particular, if L≅KBan−1 then ωY≅OY. This is an analytic dualizing-sheaf calculation and does not imply that Y is smooth, connected, or compact Kähler. If those additional conditions hold, the library's broad Calabi–Yau convention is connected compact Kähler with holomorphically trivial canonical bundle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth complex algebraic variety B, its associated complex manifold Ban, a holomorphic line bundle L→Ban, and the weighted projective hypersurface with the coordinate twists and equation in the Statement.

[A1]

Full AC is inherited through the broad Calabi–Yau convention when that convention is invoked; the local canonical-sheaf computation itself does not use choice (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

The analytic weighted projective bundle, its local transition maps, and the tautological twists on its smooth locus are as defined in Weierstrass model over a line bundle. The bundle projection is p:W→Ban.

[F2]

In this item KBan is defined in the Statement as the determinant of the holomorphic cotangent bundle. The broad Calabi–Yau convention separately requires a connected compact Kähler manifold with holomorphically trivial canonical bundle (Compact Calabi–Yau manifold conventions).

[F3]

On the smooth complex manifold W∘ containing Y, a Cartier hypersurface is locally cut out by a nonzerodivisor. In the analytic local-complete-intersection convention, its invertible dualizing line is the first Ext module of its structure sheaf into the ambient analytic dualizing line; the explicit two-term resolution computes this Ext in step 2.1.

Proof

technique · compute the relative canonical line on the smooth ambient locus and apply hypersurface adjunction
1.1F1givenconstruct

On a trivializing analytic open set for L, the weighted projective bundle is the quotient of C3∖{0} by the action λ⋅(x,y,z)=(λ2x,λ3y,λz). On W∘ the vertical Euler sequence is 0⟶OW∘⟶(OW(2)⊗p∗L2)⊕(OW(3)⊗p∗L3)⊕OW(1)⟶TW∘/Ban⟶0. Indeed the first map is tangent to the scaling orbit, with local vector 2x∂x+3y∂y+z∂z, and the quotient by that orbit is the vertical tangent bundle; the transitions in Weierstrass model over a line bundle give the displayed line-bundle factors. Taking determinants gives det⁡TW∘/Ban≅OW(6)⊗p∗L⊗5, hence ωW∘/Ban≅OW(−6)⊗p∗((L∨)⊗5).

1.2F1givenalgebra

If z≠0, the weight-one coordinate gives a smooth analytic chart. If z=0 on Y, then y2=x3; neither x nor y can vanish, so the stabilizer is μ2∩μ3={1}. Thus Y⊂W∘. The defining section is not identically zero on any component, since the local homogeneous polynomial has distinct y2 and x3 terms with coefficient 1. The local rings of the smooth analytic ambient W∘ are domains, so this section is a nonzerodivisor along Y and cuts out a Cartier hypersurface.

2.1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Let M=OW(6)⊗p∗L⊗6, the holomorphic line bundle of the defining section. In a local analytic trivialization of M and ωW∘, write the equation as a nonzerodivisor f in the regular analytic local ring A. The resolution 0→A→fA→A/(f)→0 gives Ext⁡A1(A/(f),A)=A/(f); restoring the line-bundle trivializations identifies the analytic lci dualizing line with (ωW∘⊗M)∣Y. The ambient canonical line on W∘ is ωW∘=ωW∘/Ban⊗p∗KBan. Substituting step 1.1 and M gives OW(−6)⊗p∗((L∨)⊗5)⊗p∗KBan⊗OW(6)⊗p∗L⊗6, which restricts to pY∗(KBan⊗L). Hence L≅KBan−1 makes the analytic dualizing sheaf trivial.

3.1A1F2step 2.1∎

The broad convention in [F2] requires smoothness, connectedness, compactness, a Kähler form, and a holomorphic trivialization of the canonical line bundle. Step 2.1 supplies only the last line-bundle condition when L≅KBan−1; therefore the result does not by itself identify a singular Weierstrass hypersurface with a Calabi–Yau manifold in that convention.

Remarks

The projection of the hypersurface factors through its weighted ambient bundle:

YWBpYp

The triangle commutes because pY is the restriction of p to Y. It records the maps used in adjunction and does not assert that Y is smooth.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources