How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact Reynolds and Mach nondimensionalization
Statement
Let and be open, let , and set , , and . Define , , , and . For the incompressible branch, let have continuous first time and first and second spatial partial derivatives, and let have continuous first spatial partial derivatives. Write and for the corresponding fields with the same stated regularity. Set and , where is constant. Then the original system is equivalent under this invertible change of variables to
For the barotropic branch, let have two continuous derivatives with . Let have continuous first time and first and second spatial partial derivatives, let have continuous first time and spatial partial derivatives, and let any potential have continuous spatial partial derivatives through order two. Write , , and for the rescaled fields with the corresponding stated regularity. Set and ; if a potential is present, set with . Then the exact transformed equations are
These are coefficient identities under positive changes of scale. They do not assert a limit as either dimensionless ratio tends to zero or infinity, an error estimate, uniqueness, or identical solutions when geometry or rescaled data differ.
In the optional SI interpretation, , , , , and ; and are dimensionless.
Statement references
The characteristic Reynolds ratio and similarity discussion: Stewart, MIT 8.09, Chapter 6, §6.7, printed pp. 133–134.
Independent Reynolds and Mach parameter treatment: MIT 16.01 Unified Engineering, F5 lecture notes, pp. 1–4.
The formal systems and derivative conventions: Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Positive constants , open domains , and regular fields as in the statement. Use Cartesian derivatives and the SI dimensional interpretation only to identify the ratios as dimensionless.
On the arbitrary open sets allowed here, define the original constant-density incompressible system by the pointwise equations and . These are exactly the equations of Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables whenever is a nonempty open interval and is nonempty; the present definition also permits disconnected or empty open sets, with equations on an empty product holding vacuously.
On those same open sets, define the original barotropic system by the pointwise equations and . This likewise agrees with Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables on its nonempty interval scope and extends the same formulas to disconnected or empty open sets. If no potential is present, use and .
The gradient, divergence, Laplacian, and componentwise convective derivative in these systems use the Cartesian coordinate formulas of Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables, evaluated locally on the open sets here.
Let and with . If and are limit points of their respective domains and are differentiable there, then is differentiable at and (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with ).
Proof
Every point of , when this product is nonempty, has a neighborhood with a nonempty open interval and an open ball. On this neighborhood [A1] and [A2] agree with the supplier systems, and each coordinate slice and its positive rescaling are open intervals, so both limit-point hypotheses in [F2] hold. From , , and , applying that one-variable chain rule componentwise gives , , , , and . The pressure substitution gives because the gradient of is zero.
With and , the time derivative and divergence terms in the mass equation both acquire the common factor ; dividing by this positive factor gives .
The left side of the barotropic momentum equation acquires the factor . The pressure gradient satisfies by the stated pressure scaling, while . Dividing by gives the displayed momentum equation and the coefficient .
Substituting the identities of step 1.1 into [A1] and dividing by yields the displayed incompressible equations, since . Reversing the same invertible substitutions proves the converse.
Since are positive, every scaling map and every division above is invertible. The local identities hold at every point of the open product, regardless of its connected components. If the product is empty, its rescaled product is also empty, all the pointwise equations hold vacuously, and the unique empty fields correspond under the same substitutions. Thus the equations transform exactly in both directions on every allowed domain; this algebra alone supplies no uniqueness, limiting, or error estimate.