How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact viscous diffusion layer and material-circulation decay
Statement
Let , , and . Use the constant-density incompressible model
with Cartesian derivatives and componentwise Laplacian; its unsteady Stokes system omits the convective term. Set and , with coordinates . Define and for . On define by and let be any constant scalar field. The field is smooth for and satisfies the pointwise unsteady Stokes equation and . It also solves the full constant-density Navier–Stokes system because its convective term vanishes. For each fixed and , its one-sided boundary limit is and its limit as is ; for each fixed and , its limit as is . The corner is excluded from the classical claim. For every , , , and , the absolute value of the first velocity component satisfies .
Separately, let for , set , and let be the quotient map, where . Equip this quotient with the flat smooth structure and metric induced by Euclidean translations, identifying each tangent space with through the derivative of . In this branch, the Navier–Stokes equations mean that the periodic lift satisfies the displayed constant-density system pointwise on . Choose an integer , put , and let . The periodic lift defines a smooth vector field on by ; with constant pressure, it is an exact Navier–Stokes solution for all . Choose with , , and . Define the closed lifted loop and its quotient by
The displayed lift satisfies . The loop is material when , as it does here. Define its flat-torus circulation by ; this value is unchanged if the lift is translated by a vector in . Let . Then and , which is nonconstant when . The corner-excluded wall-layer solution and periodic material-loop solution are distinct exact mathematical models; neither states an experiment or a general boundary-layer theorem. Under SI interpretation, are in metres, in seconds, in metres per second, in kilograms per cubic metre, in pascal-seconds, in square metres per second, and in inverse metres.
Statement references
Shreyas Mandre, Fluid Dynamics Lecture Notes, Chapter 3, §3.3.1
MIT 2.25 Advanced Fluid Mechanics, Solution to Stokes First Problem ATP
Constant-density equations and Euclidean circulation conventions: Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Use the constants, domains, velocities, initial and wall limits, loop orientation and regularity in the Statement. The equations are pointwise formal model equations; the first solution is classical only for .
Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables: for constant density, and the incompressible Navier–Stokes equation is with ; Cartesian derivatives and componentwise Laplacian are used. This supplies the pointwise system for the half-space field and, through the periodic-lift convention in the Statement, for the torus field. The Euclidean material-loop definition there has domain in an open subset of ; it is not used for the torus loop, whose material condition and circulation are defined through lifts in the Statement.
On the first domain the pressure is constant. On the torus, and are constant and the displayed field is periodic because .
Proof
The Gaussian integral is positive and finite: its integrand is positive and, for , , whose tail is integrable. Differentiation gives and . For , and , so and . Thus ; the field has zero divergence and zero convection because it has only an component and is independent of . The pressure gradient is zero, so [F1] gives the exact equation. Also , as , and for fixed , as .
For the periodic lift, , , , and . A constant pressure therefore makes every term in [F1] sum to zero. Let and ; the displacement satisfies . Hence is closed and , so its quotient is a smooth material loop. Translating the lift by a lattice vector changes neither its derivative nor the periodic velocity, proving the stated lift invariance. Its circulation is . The second term is the integral of for a primitive ; it vanishes because and is single-valued. Changing variables in the remaining term gives .
Substituting in the tail integral gives , since . If , then and hence .
Since , has the same sign as whenever . Thus except at its zeros, so its integral is strictly positive. With , , , and , step 1.2 has a nonzero coefficient multiplying the nonconstant exponential . This exact viscous solution therefore has a smooth material loop with nonconserved circulation; it does not assert Kelvin conservation for a viscous model.
Remarks
The sketch shows the initial material loop in the cross-section, with and . It is only a schematic of the exact parametrization in the Statement; the proof uses the parametrized curve, not the drawing.
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.1]
\draw[->] (-1.4,0) -- (1.5,0) node[right] {$x$};
\draw[->] (0,-1.1) -- (0,1.2) node[above] {$y$};
\draw[thick,domain=0:360,samples=80,variable=\t] plot ({0.9*sin(\t)},{0.65*cos(\t)});
\node at (1.08,0.86) {$y_0=b\cos\theta$};
\end{tikzpicture}