How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Linear vortex-sheet growing modes
Statement
For , assume the fields are independent of a third spatial coordinate. Let and . The real-valued interface displacement is a map , and the real-valued scalar potentials are maps . Each is on the open half-domain; and their first partial derivatives , , and admit continuous one-sided traces at , locally in . On the open half-domains use ordinary pointwise Euclidean derivatives in and set . Let be constant horizontal base velocities, and let the two half-planes and have the same constant density . The potentials satisfy and, for every fixed , , , , and tend to zero as and respectively. The stipulated linear interface equations, interpreted by one-sided traces at , are and continuity of the defined pressure perturbations . Gravity and surface tension are absent. Complexify this real linear system for the following normal-mode calculation.
For every real , every nonzero complex amplitude , and every , consider a mode of the form , , . Set and . The mode equations require
If , one root has positive real part , and its real or imaginary part gives a real exponentially growing solution of the stated linear system.
For the -periodic interface, require the fields to be periodic in and set . For a complex-valued trigonometric polynomial on this torus, define and, for , . Let be the completion of the complex-valued trigonometric polynomials in this norm; real-valued fields are viewed as elements of its real subspace. If , then for every fixed this exact mode family has bounded initial norm but unbounded evolved norm as its integer wavenumber . Thus no uniform estimate of the form holds for this family. This is a linear interface-model conclusion, not a theorem of nonlinear turbulent transition, viscous shear-layer behavior, or physical instability in a particular experiment.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The equal-density, no-gravity/no-surface-tension linear interface equations and Fourier-mode form in [A1]. The formal derivative and incompressibility conventions are the planned interface [F1].
, , , , and the mode forms , , with complex . On and , and the potentials and their first derivatives decay at the corresponding infinity. At , and with ; gravity and surface tension are absent.
Formal parameterized fluid systems and observables on defines Euclidean partial derivatives pointwise, defines the scalar Laplacian by , and applies vector Laplacians componentwise. Extending these potentials independently of a third coordinate makes this two-coordinate Laplacian the restriction of that defined three-coordinate Laplacian.
Proof
Using the planned supplier's pointwise Euclidean derivative convention [F1], substitute the upper and lower mode forms into the Laplace equations. Since multiplies each mode by and multiplies the exponential profile by , both potentials are harmonic; the chosen signs make them decay in their respective half-planes.
Let . The kinematic conditions at give and . Since , and .
Pressure continuity gives . Substitute step 2.1 and use , , and to obtain .
Put . Then and , so step 3.1 becomes .
Solving the quadratic gives , hence . When , the plus branch has positive real part . Because the interface equations have real coefficients, real and imaginary parts of a complex mode separately solve them.
On take an integer and the growing-branch interface mode , where . Its only nonzero Fourier coefficients at time are at , each of magnitude . Therefore and . For fixed and , the first norm is uniformly bounded and the second diverges as , proving the stated failure of a uniform bound.