Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-Dimensional Q-Exact Deformation Invariance

Statement

Let M be an oriented smooth manifold of finite dimension n, with integration cycle M, smooth positive volume form μ, graded algebra A=Ω∙(M;C), and integral IΓ(F)=∫MF[n] of the degree-n part. Let Q be a smooth odd derivation of A, let S,O be smooth even forms, let V be a smooth odd form, and let J⊆R be a nonempty open interval. Suppose QS=QO=0, (Q2V)e−S−tQV=0 for every t∈J, and IΓ(Q(OVe−S−tQV))=0 for every t∈J, including the zero-boundary-flux condition. Write (Oe−S−tQV)[n]=ftμ. Suppose that ft is integrable for each t∈J, is differentiable in t almost everywhere with measurable derivative, and that for every compact K⊂J one integrable majorant gK bounds both ∣ft∣ and ∣∂tft∣ for all t∈K, outside one null set. Then

Z(t):=IΓ(Oe−S−tQV)=∫Mft dμ

is constant on J, and for every t∈J,

Z′(t)=−IΓ(O(QV)e−S−tQV)=−IΓ(Q(OVe−S−tQV))=0.

In particular, the conclusion is finite-dimensional and applies only at finite parameter values in J; it gives no t→∞ saddle-point limit and no identity for an infinite-dimensional continuum functional integral.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M,μ,A,IΓ,Q,S,O,V,J satisfying the Statement, with Q-invariant integration on each OVe−S−tQV, the stated Q2V condition, and the compact-parameter integrable majorants.

[F1]

Finite-Dimensional Q-Exact Localization Data: Γ=M, A=Ω∙(M;C), IΓ(F)=∫MF[n], and Q is an odd derivation with the graded Leibniz rule. For a complex coefficient depending on real t, ∂tft(x) is the limit in C of (ft+h(x)−ft(x))/h as real h→0. Q-invariance is the integrated identity IΓ(QF)=0 on the specified admissible class; zero divergence together with zero boundary flux is a sufficient condition for obtaining that identity by graded integration by parts, and the two conditions are distinct.

[F2]

Differentiation under the integral sign: for a measurable family f(x,t) whose sections are integrable, whose parameter derivative exists almost everywhere and is measurable, and whose derivative has one L1 majorant uniform on an open parameter interval, the integral F(t)=∫f(x,t) dμ(x) is differentiable and F′(t)=∫∂tf(x,t) dμ(x).

[F3]

The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set: for a real-valued function u at an interior point t, u′(t) is the finite limit of (u(t+h)−u(t))/h as h→0, h≠0.

[F4]

A function continuous on an interval I whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of I is constant on I; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant: a real-valued function continuous on an interval and differentiable at every interior point with derivative zero throughout is constant on that interval.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Put Et=e−S−tQV. Since QV is even, coefficientwise differentiation of its exponential gives ∂tEt=−(QV)Et. The top-degree projection is linear and O is independent of t, so (∂tft)μ=−[O(QV)Et][n].

1.2givenF1algebra

The assumptions QS=0 and (Q2V)Et=0 give QEt=−(QS+tQ2V)Et=0. The graded Leibniz rule, QO=0, and the odd parity of V then give Q(OVEt)=(QO)VEt+O(QV)Et−OV(QEt)=O(QV)Et.

2.1givenF2step 1.1

Fix t0∈J and choose a<t0<b with [a,b]⊂J. The majorant g[a,b] makes every ft integrable on (a,b) and bounds its measurable parameter derivative there by one L1(M,μ) function. Applying [F2] on (a,b), and using step 1.1, gives Z′(t0)=−IΓ(O(QV)Et0).

3.1givenF1step 2.1step 1.2

Substituting step 1.2 into the derivative formula of step 2.1 yields Z′(t0)=−IΓ(Q(OVEt0))=0 by the exact integrated Q-invariance identity assumed in the Statement for F=OVEt0. Since t0 was arbitrary, Z′ vanishes throughout J.

4.1F3F4step 3.1∎

Write Z=u+iv with real functions u,v. Step 3.1 implies that both real difference quotients have limit zero at every t∈J. By [F3], for each t and all sufficiently small nonzero h, ∣u(t+h)−u(t)∣<∣h∣ and ∣v(t+h)−v(t)∣<∣h∣; hence u and v are continuous at every t. Applying [F4] to each component shows that both are constant on J. Therefore Z is constant on J.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources